Petrogenesis of High-Maficity S-type Granites: Insight from the Early Paleozoic Jinxi Granite, South China

Zhen-Tao Song,Xi-Sheng Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2022.106597
IF: 3.5
2022-01-01
Lithos
Abstract:Experimental S-type melts are characterized by high silica (SiO2 > 70 wt%) and low-maficity (FeOT + MgO < 4 wt%) natures. However, more and more studies revealed that many natural S-type granites exhibited chemical compositions differing from the experimental melts, these S-type granites have relatively low SiO2 but high FeOT + MgO contents. Several models have been proposed for their petrogenesis: magma mixing, source heterogeneity, entrainment of metamorphic garnets, crystal accumulation, etc. In this study, we carried out integrated petrological and mineralogical researches on the early Paleozoic Jinxi granites (ca. 442 Ma) in the Cathaysia Block, South China. They are strongly peraluminous (average A/CNK = 1.31), K-rich (average K2O/Na2O = 1.50) S-type granites, and can be divided into high-maficity (FeOT + MgO > 4%) and low-maficity types (FeOT + MgO < 4%). A combing of field, petrological, and lithochemical evidence indicates that the Jinxi granites did not undergo magma mixing process, and they were derived from ancient crustal rocks without the input of mantle-derived ferromagnesian components, ruling out the mixing model. Both the high-maficity and low-maficity samples of the Jinxi granites show whole-rock Sr-Nd and zircon Hf-O isotopic characteristics indicating a metasedimentary origin, precluding the mafic meta-igneous source. The metasedimentary origin is also supported by the evidence of inherited zircons, whole-rock geochemistry and field observation. Melt extraction and crystal accumulation seem unlikely due to the absences of a prominent silica gap and the complementary geochemical relationship between the high-maficity and low-maficity granites. Furthermore, the absences of metamorphic garnets and significant positive correlations of FeOT + MgO vs. Y, Yb, and A/CNK, argue against the metamorphic garnet entrainment model. The biotites with a very high proportion (up to ~25%) are observed in the high-maficity granites, indicating that these biotites are not all magmatic biotites. It is supported by their occurrences and compositions. Given that the Jinxi granites formed via biotite fluid-absent melting at ~828 °C and ~ 5 kbar, remnant reactant biotites and potential peritectic biotites should be high-temperature and Ti-rich, which differs from the Ti-poor characteristic of the biotites in the Jinxi high-maficity granites. Moreover, highly variable whole-rock chemistry, particularly Na:K ratios, and petrographic observations suggest that the Jinxi granites have been modified by late- to post-magmatic processes involving introduction of alkalis and H2O during cooling. These features suggest the partial replacement of early magmatic garnet by biotite, and plenty of secondary biotites formed in post-magmatic metamorphism and alteration, which leads to a high proportion of biotite, and thus high FeOT + MgO contents in the Jinxi high-maficity granites. In this case, the effect of late- to post-magmatic processes should be noticed in the study on high-maficity S-type granites.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?