IRX1 Promotes Loss of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue by Inhibiting Adipocyte Differentiation in Cachectic Patients with Gastric Cancer

Jun Han,Zuoyou Ding,Qiulin Zhuang,Lei Shen,Fan Yang,Szechun Sah,Guohao Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1344846/v1
2022-01-01
Abstract:Background: Loss of adipose tissue is one of the most important characteristics of cancer cachexia. The loss degree of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is different in the same cachectic patient. However, it is unclear which genes lead to the differential fat loss in cancer cachexia. The purpose of this study is to screen the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) profile of SAT and VAT and clarify its function in cancer cachexia. Methods: We screened the DEGs of SAT and VAT in cachectic patients with gastric cancer by RNA sequencing. Gene enrichment analyses were preformed to analyze the biological function of DEGs. Interaction network was constructed to illustrate the relationship among key genes. Clinical significance of IRX1 related to cancer cachexia was illustrated by Spearman’s correlation analysis. SAT and VAT samples were collected and performed histomorphology analyses. Mouse model of cancer cachexia was established and differences between SAT and VAT were compared. The function of IRX1 on lipid metabolism was clarified by Oil Red O staining, qPCR, and western blotting in adipocytes. Results: A total of 455 DEGs were screened between SAT and VAT in cachectic patients with gastric cancer. Gene enrichment analysis indicated that the immune response might contribute to the pathological difference of SAT and VAT in caner cachexia. Patients with higher expression of IRX1 in SAT than VAT revealed significantly higher weight loss, IL-6 and TNFa concentration, as well as lower BMI, apoE, SAT and VAT area. A greater loss in SAT was observed in cachectic mice comparing to non-cachectic mice while the expression of IRX1 in SAT of cachectic mice was significantly higher. Oil Red O staining showed that IRX1 inhibited lipogenesis in adipocytes. Significant changes in the genes related to adipocyte differentiation and adipogenesis were observed in both the cases of IRX1 overexpression and knockdown. Conclusion: Higher expression of IRX1 was observed in SAT than VAT in gastric cancer patients with cachexia and thus IRX1 promotes loss of SAT by inhibiting adipocyte differentiation and adipogenesis. IRX1 is expected to be a potential target for the prevention and treatment of SAT loss in cancer cachexia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?