Abstract:Background Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart disease and a major risk factor for aortic stenosis (AS). Myocardial remodelling response to AS plays an important prognostic role1. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can evaluate myocardial structure, function and perfusion in AS. Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) can also assess myocardial energetic consequences of AS2. Purpose Assess differences in myocardial remodelling between tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and BAV-associated severe-AS, and their recovery 6 months post aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods Eighty severe-AS patients (70[69-72]years) undergoing AVR (40 TAV, 40 BAV) and 21 demographically-matched controls were recruited. AS groups were matched for demographics, AS severity, surgical risk scores and comorbidities. One month before and 6 months post-AVR, patients underwent CMR and 31P-MRS for measuring left ventricular (LV) mass, concentricity-index (LV mass to LV end-diastolic volume ratio), global longitudinal shortening (GLS), rest and adenosine-stress myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) and energetics-index phosphocreatine to ATP ratio (PCr/ATP). Results Pre-AVR, there was no significant differences between the three cohorts when assessing LV ejection fraction, indexed LV end-diastolic volume and indexed end-systolic volume. Pre-AVR, both AS groups showed higher LV-concentricity (controls:0.53[0.51,0.60], TAV:0.95[0.82,1.07], BAV:0.92[0.82,1.08]g/ml;P<0.0001), higher mass-index (controls:45[39,50], TAV:73[67,78], BAV:74[68,80]g/m2;P<0.0001), impaired GLS (controls:18.8[16.5,19.5], TAV:12.6[11.3,13.9], BAV:13.6[10.9,16.6]%;P<0.0001). Reductions in both AS groups were also seen in PCr/ATP (controls:2.19[1.85,2.63], TAV:1.64[1.39,1.85], BAV:1.85[1.60,2.10];P=0.0004), stress-MBF (controls:2.16[1.88,2.27], TAV:1.35 [1.16,1.56], BAV:1.36[1.00,1.66]ml/min/g;P<0.0001), and MPR (controls:3.38[2.65,3.92], TAV:2.04 [1.78,2.46], BAV:1.83[1.58,2.78]ml/min/g;P<0.0001) against controls, with no significant differences between TAV and BAV. No significant difference was seen in the proportion of patients with TAV and BAV undergoing transcatheter or surgical AVR (table1). Post-AVR, the TAV and BAV groups experienced similar patterns of reverse LV-remodelling, with no significant differences in LV-concentricity (TAV:0.86[0.71,0.98], BAV:0.81[0.65,0.96];P=0.41), LV-mass-index (TAV:60[54,65], BAV:61[55,66];P=0.81), GLS (TAV 15.4[13.6,17.9], BAV 16.3[12.8,18.1];P=0.82. Perfusion and cardiac energetic improvements were also similar between the AS cohorts: PCr/ATP (TAV:1.96[1.68,2.26], BAV:1.96[1.79,2.13];P=0.91), stress-MBF (TAV:1.63[1.37,1.97], BAV:1.56[1.25,1.97];P=0.86), and MPR (TAV:2.64[1.91,3.26], BAV:2.55[2.07,3.28];P=0.70). Conclusions Patients with severe AS irrespective of BAV or TAV morphology, show a similar myocardial phenotype pre-AVR, with similar magnitudes of reverse remodelling post-AVR.

Association of Aortic Distensibility and Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Preserved Ejection Fraction: a CMR Study

Prognostic Role of Aortic Distensibility in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve: a CMR Study

Left atrial strain brings new insights for evaluating early diastolic dysfunction in patients with well-functioning bicuspid aortic valve

Multidirectional myocardial function in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis patients: a three-dimensional speckle tracking analysis

Comparison study of left ventricular reverse remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve replacement of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis

Pro-angiogenic Cytokine Features for Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis and CMR characteristics in bicuspid aortic valve with moderate and severe aortic insufficiency

Sex-specific Aortic Root Anatomy in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Undergoing TAVR in a Chinese Cohort.

Association Between Progression of Arterial Stiffness and Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Community-Based Cohort

Myocardial remodelling in bicuspid aortic valve associated severe aortic stenosis and reverse remodelling after aortic valve replacement

Prognostic Implications of Left Atrial Strain in Bicuspid Aortic Valve With Chronic Aortic Regurgitation

Comparison of Pressure vs Volume Overload Ventricular Wall Stress in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-determined left ventricular myocardium impairment is associated with C-reactive protein and ST2 in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement or repair in bicuspid aortic valve with moderate or greater aortic regurgitation

Cardiac magnetic resonance patterns of left ventricular remodeling in patients with severe aortic stenosis referred to surgical aortic valve replacement

Vessel structural stress mediates aortic media degeneration in bicuspid aortopathy: New insights based on patient-specific fluid-structure interaction analysis

Biventricular interaction and aortic function in adult patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a two-dimensional-three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiographic study

Dissecting myocardial mechanics in patients with severe aortic stenosis: 2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional-speckle tracking echocardiography

Comparing left atrial indices by CMR in association with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and adverse clinical outcomes

Radiomic analysis of enhanced CMR cine images predicts left ventricular remodeling after TAVR in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis

Circulating Matrix Metalloproteinase Patterns in Association with Aortic Dilatation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients with Isolated Severe Aortic Stenosis