Abstract:BackgroundUbiquitination, which is also called “lysine ubiquitination”, occurs when an ubiquitin is attached to lysine (K) residues in targeting proteins. As one of the most important post translational modifications (PTMs), it plays the significant role not only in protein degradation, but also in other cellular functions. Thus, systematic anatomy of the ubiquitination proteome is an appealing and challenging research topic. The existing methods for identifying protein ubiquitination sites can be divided into two kinds: mass spectrometry and computational methods. Mass spectrometry-based experimental methods can discover ubiquitination sites from eukaryotes, but are time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, it is priority to develop computational approaches that can effectively and accurately identify protein ubiquitination sites.ResultsThe existing computational methods usually require feature engineering, which may lead to redundancy and biased representations. While deep learning is able to excavate underlying characteristics from large-scale training data via multiple-layer networks and non-linear mapping operations. In this paper, we proposed a deep architecture within multiple modalities to identify the ubiquitination sites. First, according to prior knowledge and biological knowledge, we encoded protein sequence fragments around candidate ubiquitination sites into three modalities, namely raw protein sequence fragments, physico-chemical properties and sequence profiles, and designed different deep network layers to extract the hidden representations from them. Then, the generative deep representations corresponding to three modalities were merged to build the final model. We performed our algorithm on the available largest scale protein ubiquitination sites database PLMD, and achieved 66.4% specificity, 66.7% sensitivity, 66.43% accuracy, and 0.221 MCC value. A number of comparative experiments also indicated that our multimodal deep architecture outperformed several popular protein ubiquitination site prediction tools.ConclusionThe results of comparative experiments validated the effectiveness of our deep network and also displayed that our method outperformed several popular protein ubiquitination site prediction tools. The source codes of our proposed method are available at https://github.com/jiagenlee/deepUbiquitylation.

Deep Metric Learning for Proteomics Deep Metric Learning for Proteomics

DeepTrio: a Ternary Prediction System for Protein-Protein Interaction Using Mask Multiple Parallel Convolutional Neural Networks

Deep Learning in Proteomics

Deep Learning in Proteomics Informatics: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Deep learning neural network tools for proteomics

DeepIso: A Deep Learning Model for Peptide Feature Detection

AlphaPeptDeep: a modular deep learning framework to predict peptide properties for proteomics

Learning Protein Embedding to Improve Protein Fold Recognition Using Deep Metric Learning

DeepIso: A Deep Learning Model for Peptide Feature Detection from LC-MS Map

Deep Learning-Based Modeling of Drug–Target Interaction Prediction Incorporating Binding Site Information of Proteins

Deep Learning Powers Protein Identification from Precursor MS Information

Test-Time Training for Deep MS/MS Spectrum Prediction Improves Peptide Identification.

Deep learning-based proteomics enables accurate classification of bulk and single-cell samples

ProPept-MT: A Multi-Task Learning Model for Peptide Feature Prediction

DeepProtein: Deep Learning Library and Benchmark for Protein Sequence Learning

DeepPD: A Deep Learning Method for Predicting Peptide Detectability Based on Multi-feature Representation and Information Bottleneck

Predicting Protein-Peptide Binding Residues Via Interpretable Deep Learning.

DeepSP: A Deep Learning Framework for Spatial Proteomics.

Pdeep: Predicting MS/MS Spectra of Peptides with Deep Learning.

Large-scale prediction of protein ubiquitination sites using a multimodal deep architecture

Deep learning-derived evaluation metrics enable effective benchmarking of computational tools for phosphopeptide identification.