Abstract:Background Our understanding of the composition, function, and health implications of human microbiota has been advanced by high-throughput sequencing and the development of new genomic analyses. However, trade-offs among alternative strategies for the acquisition and analysis of sequence data remain understudied. Methods We assessed eight popular taxonomic profiling pipelines; MetaPhlAn2, metaMix, PathoScope 2.0, Sigma, Kraken, ConStrains, Centrifuge and Taxator-tk, against a battery of metagenomic datasets simulated from real data. The metagenomic datasets were modeled on 426 complete or permanent draft genomes stored in the Human Oral Microbiome Database and were designed to simulate various experimental conditions, both in the design of a putative experiment; read length (75–1,000 bp reads), sequence depth (100K–10M), and in metagenomic composition; number of species present (10, 100, 426), species distribution. The sensitivity and specificity of each of the pipelines under various scenarios were measured. We also estimated the relative root mean square error and average relative error to assess the abundance estimates produced by different methods. Additional datasets were generated for five of the pipelines to simulate the presence within a metagenome of an unreferenced species, closely related to other referenced species. Additional datasets were also generated in order to measure computational time on datasets of ever-increasing sequencing depth (up to 6 × 10 7 ). Results Testing of eight pipelines against 144 simulated metagenomic datasets initially produced 1,104 discrete results. Pipelines using a marker gene strategy; MetaPhlAn2 and ConStrains, were overall less sensitive, than other pipelines; with the notable exception of Taxator-tk. This difference in sensitivity was largely made up in terms of runtime, significantly lower than more sensitive pipelines that rely on whole-genome alignments such as PathoScope2.0. However, pipelines that used strategies to speed-up alignment between genomic references and metagenomic reads, such as kmerization, were able to combine both high sensitivity and low run time, as is the case with Kraken and Centrifuge. Absent species genomes in the database mostly led to assignment of reads to the most closely related species available in all pipelines. Our results therefore suggest that taxonomic profilers that use kmerization have largely superseded those that use gene markers, coupling low run times with high sensitivity and specificity. Taxonomic profilers using more time-consuming read reassignment, such as PathoScope 2.0, provided the most sensitive profiles under common metagenomic sequencing scenarios. All the results described and discussed in this paper can be visualized using the dedicated R Shiny application ( https://github.com/microgenomics/HumanMicrobiomeAnalysis ). All of our datasets, pipelines and results are made available through the GitHub repository for future benchmarking.

In Silico Genome-Genome Hybridization Values Accurately and Precisely Predict Empirical DNA-DNA Hybridization Values for Classifying Prokaryotes

Microarray-Based Whole-Genome Hybridization As A Tool for Determining Procaryotic Species Relatedness

Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions

Analyzing DNA Hybridization via machine learning

Average Nucleotide Identity and Digital DNA-DNA Hybridization Analysis Following PromethION Nanopore-Based Whole Genome Sequencing Allows for Accurate Prokaryotic Typing

In silico PCR analysis: a comprehensive bioinformatics tool for enhancing nucleic acid amplification assays

Relationship Between Genome Similarity and DNA-DNA Hybridization among Closely Related Bacteria.

Detectability of Varied Hybridization Scenarios using Genome-Scale Hybrid Detection Methods

Accurate and sensitive quantification of protein-DNA binding affinity

DNA hybridization to mismatched templates: a chip study

Biostatistical Considerations of the Use of Genomic DNA Reference in Microarrays.

ML-DSP: Machine Learning with Digital Signal Processing for ultrafast, accurate, and scalable genome classification at all taxonomic levels

Hybridization Isotherms of DNA Microarrays and the Quantification of Mutation Studies

eDNAssay: A machine learning tool that accurately predicts qPCR cross‐amplification

Automated Classification and Cluster Visualization of Genotypes Derived from High Resolution Melt Curves

Evaluation of computational methods for human microbiome analysis using simulated data

Improved accuracy assessment for 3D genome reconstructions

Predicting Functions of Proteins in Mouse Based on Weighted Protein-Protein Interaction Network and Protein Hybrid Properties.

Encoding of low-quality DNA profiles as genotype probability matrices for improved profile comparisons, relatedness evaluation and database searches

Parametric Alignment of Drosophila Genomes

GeneMarkS-2 : Raising Standards of Accuracy in Gene Recognition