Abstract:The formation of reference points has drawn increasing interest ever since the introduction of prospect theory. Given that most studies focus on tradable goods such as stocks, for which the prices are observable, while few have focused on environmental goods. This paper attempts to fill this gap in the literature in this regard. In our experiment, we divided the subjects into buyers and sellers and asked them to trade four PM 2.5 filters using the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak mechanism. We have two treatments in this experiment: a) the experience of seven weeks of heavy air pollution; and b) the receiving of information on the relationship between death rates and air pollution. The different bidding prices for the four PM 2.5 filters in these treatment groups make it possible to trace the adjustment of the reference points as a result of these treatments without having to know their precise values. Our results show that, for buyers, the heavy air pollution drives them to fully downwardly adjust their reference points on air quality. For sellers, however, the reference points adaptation caused by heavy pollution is not a full adaptation. Moreover, the new information on the damage to health from air pollution causes buyers to upwardly adjust their reference points on air quality but does not significantly change the sellers’ reference points. We show that, for both treatments, sellers are more reluctant to adjust their reference points on air quality than are buyers. Our results confirm the asymmetric reference point adaptation in that adaptation after a loss is harder than adaptation after a gain.

Do Buyers and Sellers Evaluate Air Pollution Reduction Differently? Experimental Evidence from China

Income Elasticity of Willingness to Pay for Better Air Quality

Reference Point Adaptation and Air Quality – Experimental Evidence with Anti-Pm 2.5 Facemasks from China

Recency and projection biases in air quality valuation by Chinese residents.

Negotiating Housing Deal on a Polluted Day: Consequences and Possible Explanations

Economic effects of air quality on housing prices: evidence from Beijing, China

Spatial heterogeneity of marginal willingness to pay for air quality in PM2.5: analysis of buyers’ housing price in Beijing through hedonic price, spatial regression, and quantile regression models

Contaminated Heart: Does Air Pollution Harm Business Ethics? Evidence from Earnings Manipulation

Does Declining Air Pollution Levels Always Signal Higher Premium for Housing Market?

Does air pollution affect seasoned equity offering pricing? Evidence from investor bids

Smog Avoidance Investment While Improving Air Quality: Health Demand or Risk Aversion? Evidence from Cities in China

Projection Bias in Decision-Making: Daily Air Pollution and Willingness to Pay for Better Air Quality

Willingness to Pay to Reduce Health Risks Related to Air Quality: Evidence from a Choice Experiment Survey in Beijing

Valuing urban air quality: a hedonic price analysis in Beijing, China

Pricing for the Clean Air: Evidence from Chinese Housing Market

Self-Protection Investment Exacerbates Air Pollution Exposure Inequality in Urban China

Willingness to Pay for Staying Away from Haze: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in Xi'an.

Effect of Carbon Market on Air Pollution: Firm-level Evidence in China

Pollution and Performance: Do Investors Make Worse Trades on Hazy Days?

Real Estate Valuation and Cross-Boundary Air Pollution Externalities: Evidence from Chinese Cities

Measuring the Welfare Cost of Air Pollution in Shanghai: Evidence from the Housing Market