Omnipolar Conduction Velocity Mapping for Ventricular Substrate Characterisation: Impact of CV Estimation Method and EGM Type on In-Vivo Conduction Velocity Measurements

Johanna Tonko,Mahmoud Ehnesh,Edmon Vigmond,Anthony Chow,Caroline Roney,Pier D. Lambiase
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.061
IF: 6.779
2024-06-08
Heart Rhythm
Abstract:Background Areas of abnormal and/or heterogenous conduction velocity (CV) are important ablation targets for ventricular tachycardias. Yet, precise assessment of CV in clinical contact mapping remains challenging. Numerous different CV estimation methods have been proposed. Objective To compare the automated LAT-independent omnipolar-based CV estimation method termed "Wave Speed" (WS) with four established LAT-based methods and formally establish the quantitative differences between them. Methods High-density contact maps in patients with structurally normal hearts during sinus rhythm and ventricular ectopy (VE) were retrospectively analysed. CV was assessed and compared using five methods: 1.Omnipolar WS, 2.Gradient method, 3.Planar wavefront fitting (PWF) 4.Circular wavefront fitting (CWF), 5.Radial basis function (RBF). CV variations based on EGM type (uni-/bi-/omnipolar), catheter movement and surrogate markers for catheter contact were analysed. Results 23 patients (47.8% male, 45.7±17.3 years) with 22 sinus (11 LV/11 RV) and 16 VE maps (9 LV/7 RV) were included. WS algorithm yielded statistically significant higher CV estimates in SR (mean 1.41 ±0.18m/s) and VE maps (mean 1.23±0.18m/s) compared to all LAT-based estimation methods with absolute differences ranging from 0.1m/s to 0.81m/s. Median pointwise differences in SR and VE between WS and LAT-based methods were high, ranging from 0.55±0.15m/s (WS vs. PWF) to 0.67±0.16m/s (WS vs. RBF). For LAT-based methods, use of unipolar EGMs yielded significantly higher CV estimates than bi-/omnipolar EGMs in sinus. Conclusion The CV estimation method has an important, statistically significant impact on ventricular CV measurements. Future work will focus on how these differences impact identification of pathological conduction slowing in scar-related substrate.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?