Abstract:Endovenous ablation of varicose veins using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) has reported advantages over traditional open surgical treatment. There is little evidence comparing the efficacy and patient-reported outcomes between the two endovenous solutions. This study compares the RFA and EVLT strategies in a prospective double-blind clinical trial. Consecutive patients with primary unilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux undergoing endovenous treatment were randomized to RFA (VNUS ClosureFAST) or EVLT (810-nm diode laser). The primary outcome measure was GSV occlusion at 3 months after treatment. Secondary outcome measures were occlusion at 7 days, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising, assessed at day 7 after surgery. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D. A total of 159 patients were randomized to RFA (79 patients) or EVLT (80 patients). Groups were well matched for demographics, disease extent, severity, and preoperative QoL. Duplex scanning confirmed 100% vein occlusion at 1 week in both groups. At 3 months, occlusion was 97% for RFA and 96% for EVLT; P = 0.67. Median (interquartile range) percentage above-knee bruise area was greater after EVLT 3.85% (6.1) than after RFA 0.6% (2); P = 0.0001. Postoperative pain assessed at each of the first 7 postoperative days was less after RFA (P = 0.001). Changes in the AVVQ (P = 0.12) and EQ-5D (P = 0.66) at 3 months were similar in both groups. RFA and EVLT offer comparable venous occlusion rates at 3 months after treatment of primary GSV varices; with neither modality proving superior. RFA is associated with less periprocedural pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising. Endovenous ablation of varicose veins using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) has reported advantages over traditional open surgical treatment. There is little evidence comparing the efficacy and patient-reported outcomes between the two endovenous solutions. This chapter presents a study that compares the RFA and EVLT strategies in a prospective double-blind clinical trial. Consecutive patients with primary unilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux undergoing endovenous treatment were randomized to RFA (VNUS ClosureFAST) or EVLT. The primary outcome measure was GSV occlusion at 3 months after treatment. Secondary outcome measures were occlusion at 7 days, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising, assessed at day 7 after surgery. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D. RFA is associated with less periprocedural pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising.

Clinical Outcomes of Different Endovenous Procedures among Patients with Varicose Veins and Iliac Vein Compression: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

[Efficacy of Integrated Minimally Invasive Treatment for Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome with Varicose Veins of Lower Extremities].

The clinical outcomes of endovenous microwave and laser ablation for varicose veins: A prospective study

Outcomes of endovenous laser ablation with additional iliac vein stenting of nonthrombotic lesions in patients presenting with active venous ulcers

Post-operative Benefit of Compression Therapy after Endovenous Laser Ablation for Uncomplicated Varicose Veins: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Endovenous ablation with laser for great saphenous vein insufficiency and tributary varices: a retrospective evaluation.

Clinical outcomes of nonthermal ablation, thermal ablation, and surgical stripping for varicose veins

Venous stenting versus venous ablation

Endovenous laser ablation versus conventional surgery (ligation and stripping) for primary great saphenous varicose vein: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparative Efficacy of Postoperative Compression Methods After EVLT for Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency

Interventions for great saphenous vein insufficiency: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Safety and Efficacy of Combining Saphenous Endovenous Laser Ablation and Varicose Veins Foam Sclerotherapy: An Analysis on 5500 Procedures in Patients With Advance Chronic Venous Disease (C3-C6)

Controlled study of endovenous laser ablation combined with foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of valvular insufficiency of great saphenous vein

Endovenous Laser Ablation in Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency with Preservation of Great Saphenous Vein

Evaluation of Endovenous Laser Ablation in the Management of Varicose Veins

Clinical efficacy of sodium aescinate administration following endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins

A Comparison of Concomitant Tributary Laser Ablation and Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients Undergoing Truncal Endovenous Laser Ablation for Lower Limb Varicose Veins

Ten-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of endothermal ablation versus conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins

A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency versus Laser Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients with Varicose Veins

Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus direct and indirect radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins

The Effect of Endovenous Laser Ablation of Incompetent Perforating Veins and the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients with Primary Venous Disease