SAturation-recovery and Variable-flip-Angle-based three-dimensional free-breathing cardiovascular magnetic resonance T<sub>1</sub> mapping at 3 T

Rui Guo,Dongyue Si,Zhensen Chen,Erpeng Dai,Shuo Chen,Daniel A. Herzka,Jianwen Luo,Haiyan Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4755
2022-01-01
NMR in Biomedicine
Abstract:The purpose of the current study was to develop and validate a three-dimensional (3D) free-breathing cardiac T-1-mapping sequence using SAturation-recovery and Variable-flip-Angle (SAVA). SAVA sequentially acquires multiple electrocardiogram-triggered volumes using a multishot spoiled gradient-echo sequence. The first volume samples the equilibrium signal of the longitudinal magnetization, where a flip angle of 2 degrees is used to reduce the time for the magnetization to return to equilibrium. The succeeding three volumes are saturation prepared with variable delays, and are acquired using a 15 degrees flip angle to maintain the signal-to-noise ratio. A diaphragmatic navigator is used to compensate the respiratory motion. T-1 is calculated using a saturation-recovery model that accounts for the flip angle. We validated SAVA by simulations, phantom, and human subject experiments at 3 T. SAVA was compared with modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) and saturation-recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) in vivo. In phantoms, T-1 by SAVA had good agreement with the reference (R-2 = 0.99). In vivo 3D T-1 mapping by SAVA could achieve an imaging resolution of 1.25 x 1.25 x 8 mm(3). Both global and septal T-1 values by SAVA (1347 +/- 37 and 1332 +/- 42 ms) were in between those by SASHA (1612 +/- 63 and 1618 +/- 51 ms) and MOLLI (1143 +/- 59 and 1188 +/- 65 ms). According to the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV), T-1 precision measured by SAVA (SD: 99 +/- 14 and 60 +/- 8 ms; CV: 7.4% +/- 0.9% and 4.5% +/- 0.6%) was comparable with MOLLI (SD: 99 +/- 25 and 46 +/- 12 ms; CV: 8.8% +/- 2.5% and 3.9% +/- 1.1%) and superior to SASHA (SD: 222 +/- 89 and 132 +/- 33 ms; CV: 13.8% +/- 5.5% and 8.1% +/- 2.0%). It was concluded that the proposed free-breathing SAVA sequence enables more efficient 3D whole-heart T-1 estimation with good accuracy and precision.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?