Tunable Covalent Organic Frameworks with Different Heterocyclic Nitrogen Locations for Efficient Cr(VI) Reduction, Escherichia coli Disinfection, and Paracetamol Degradation under Visible-Light Irradiation
Fuyang Liu,Zhiyao Ma,Yuchen Deng,Meng Wang,Peng Zhou,Wen Liu,Shaojun Guo,Meiping Tong,Ding Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07857
2021-03-19
Abstract:Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have great application potentials in photocatalytic water treatment. By using <i>p</i>-phenylenediamine with different numbers and locations of heterocyclic nitrogen atoms as a precursor, five types of COFs with different nitrogen positions were synthesized. We found that Cr(VI) photoreduction,<i>Escherichia coli</i> inactivation, and paracetamol degradation by COFs were heterocyclic nitrogen location-dependent. Particularly, the photocatalytic performance for all three tested pollutants by five types of COFs followed the order of the best performance for COF-PDZ with two ortho position heterocyclic N atoms, medium for COF-PMD with two meta position heterocyclic N atoms, and COF-PZ with two para position heterocyclic N atoms, and COF-PD with a single heterocyclic N atom, the worst performance for COF-1 without a heterocyclic N atom. Compared to the other COFs, COF-PDZ contained improved quantum efficiency and thus enhanced generation of electrons. The lower energy barriers and larger energy gaps of COF-PDZ contributed to its improved quantum efficiencies. The stronger affinity to Cr(VI) with lower adsorption energy of COF-PDZ also contributed to its excellent Cr(VI) reduction performance. By transferring into a more stable keto form, COF-PDZ showed great stability through five regeneration and reuse cycles. Overall, this study provided an insight into the synthesis of high-performance structure-dependent COF-based photocatalysts.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c07857?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c07857</a>.Details of chemicals (Text S1); details of characterization instruments (Text S2); details of the ESR experiments (Text S3); details of the photoelectrochemical experiments (Text S4); details of photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and adsorption experiments (Text S5); details of bacterial cultivation, counting, and photocatalytic experiments (Text S6); paracetamol determination method and photocatalytic experiments (Text S7); methods for the detection of intermediates (Text S8); H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> detection method (Text S9); details of the DFT calculation for paracetamol molecules (Text S10); details of the reusability experiments (Text S11); equations of proposed mechanisms for photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction (Text S12); detailed discussion on Cr(VI) adsorption on COFs (Text S13); efficiency comparison of COF-PDZ and other reported Cr(VI) photocatalytic reduction materials (Table S1); parameters of first-order kinetics model for Cr(VI) photocatalytic reduction by synthesized COFs (Table S2); parameters of first-order kinetics model for photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol by synthesized COFs (Table S3); intermediates generated during photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol by COF-PDZ (Table S4); NPA charge distribution and Fukui index (<i>f</i><sup>0</sup>) of paracetamol (Table S5); bioaccumulation factors of common organic matter (Table S6); calculation and correction of adsorption energies of H<sub>2</sub>Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub> on the COFs by a GGA + <i>U</i> method (Table S7); calculated energy levels and gaps of the HOMO and LUMO for the five COFs by using GGA-PBE methods (Table S8); comparison about the calculated HOMO–LUMO gaps for the five COFs by using PBE and HSE methods (Table S9); photocatalytic experimental set-up (Figure S1); converge test for energy cutoff (Figure S2); converge test for <i>k</i>-points (Figure S3); calculated energy gaps by the GGA + <i>U</i> method (Figure S4); N<sub>2</sub> adsorption–desorption isotherms and the NLDFT pore adsorption d<i>V</i>/d<i>w</i> pore volume analyses (Figures S5–S8); UV–vis DRS spectra (Figure S9); Mott–Schottky plots (Figure S10); XPS valence band spectra (Figure S11); batch Cr(VI) and Cr(III) adsorption results (Figure S12); first-order kinetics model fitting (Figure S13); concentration of Cr(VI) and total Cr (Figure S14); XPS spectra (Cr 2p) of COF-PDZ (Figure S15); Cr K-edge XANES spectra of COFs, Cr foil, and Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (Figure S16); first derivative of XANES of different samples (Figure S17); probable mechanism of photocatalytic reduction (Figure S18); fluorescence spectra of TAOH (Figure S19); concentration of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> generated by COF-PDZ in the N<sub>2</sub> atmosphere (Figure S20); ESR spectra for the detection of ·O<sub>2</sub><sup>–</sup> (Figure S21); SEM images of <i>E. coli</i> (Figure S22); concentrations of K<sup>+</sup> released from <i>E. coli</i> (Figure S23); chemical structure of paracetamol (Figure S24); degradation pathway of paracetamol during the photocatalytic process (Figure S25); acute toxicity and bioaccumulation factor (Figure S26); transient photocurrent responses of COFs (Figure S27); electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Figure S28); and PL spectra of the five COFs (Fi <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental