Petrogenesis of Late Cretaceous Volcanic-Plutonic Complex from Xiaoxiong Caldera in East Zhejiang

Zheng ShiShuai,Xu XiSheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18654/1000-0569/2021.12.08
2021-01-01
Abstract:The association of volcanic and shallow plutonic rocks in calderas may provide important clues to the geochemical evolution of silicic magma systems, and thus it has received a lot of attention. The Xiaoxiong caldera, mainly composed of volcanic rocks of the Xiaoxiong Formation (K(2)x) and two types of plutonic rocks (granite-porphyry and syenite-porphyry), is a typical product of Late Cretaceous magmatism in SE China. In this paper, we conducted petrological and geochemical studies, as well as zircon dating and trace element analysis for the coexisting volcanic and plutonic rocks from the Xiaoxiong caldera, aiming to constrain the magmatic origin and evolution processes and evaluate the petrogenetic relationship between the volcanism and plutonism. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating results revealed that the Xiaoxiong Formation was formed in 98 similar to 88Ma with characteristics of multi-staged eruptions. The ages of the I-, II-, III-cycle volcanic rocks are constrained at 98 similar to 96Ma (K(2)x(1)), 95 similar to 92 Ma (K(2)x(2)) and 88Ma (K(2)x(3)), respectively. Meanwhile, zircon U-Pb dating provides crystallization ages of ca. 90Ma for granite-porphyry and ca. 88Ma for syenite-porphyry. However, in terms of Nd-Hf isotopic compositions, the rhyolites from the middle section [epsilon(Nd) (t) = -8.3 similar to -7.2, epsilon(Hf) (t) = -11.8 similar to -7.2] record increasingly depleted characteristics to the rhyolitic vitric tuffs from the lower section [epsilon(Nd)(t) = 5.84 similar to 5.32, epsilon(Hf)(t) = -10.1 similar to -0.5], implying a progressive crust-mantle interaction, and more juvenile, Nd-Hf isotopically depleted materials were involved into the source of these rhyolites. The rhyolites from the middle section and the granite-porphyry show "cogenetic" and "complementary" geochemical signatures. Therefore, we suggest that they could be closely linked by fractional crystallization and crystal accumulation in a shallow magma chamber, i.e., these rhyolites are formed by the extraction of interstitial melt from crystal mush, while the granite-porphyry represents the residual crystal mush. It is worth to note that there is no directly evolutional relationship between granite-porphyry and syenite-porphyry, and they are more likely to have different magmatic origins. In addition, the syenite-porphyries of different stocks in the Xiaoxiong caldera have a highly consistent crystallization ages, trace element characteristics and Nd-Hf isotope compositions, which indicates that they have the same magmatic origins. The syenite-porphyry was generated probably by "pyroxene + apatite + ilmenite"-dominated fractional crystallization from basaltic magma that was produced by magma mixing between melts derived from depleted asthenosphere and subduction-related enriched lithospheric mantle.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?