Abstract:Objective:To assess the clinical outcome of the novel computer assisted reduction malarplasty using angled double L-shaped osteotomies.Methods:Retrospective analysis of the 35 female patients who received reduction malarplasty surgery during June 2014 to April 2019 was conducted. Patients were divided into the conventional surgery group (9 cases) and the computer assisted surgery group (26 cases) based on their personal will. For the conventional surgery group, the zygomatic arch was repositioned inwardly after L-shaped osteotomy, and was rigidly fixed with miniplates and screws. The computer assisted reduction malarplasty was as follows: computer assisted angled double L-shaped osteotomies with surgical guide was performed intraorally, and the pre-bent titanium was used to setback the resected zygoma bone, which was then fixed with titanium miniplates and screws. Operation time, patients’ satisfaction (3-month follow-up) and postoperative complications (asymmetry and bone nonunion) were recorded and assessed. CT scans were performed to compare the preoperative design and 3-month postoperative follow-up for the computer assisted patient group. For statistical analysis, independent sample t test was used to analyze operation time of the 2 groups and chi-square test was used to analyze the data of patients’ satisfaction and asymmetry occurrence. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results:The mean operation time was (85.1 ± 17.8) min during computer assisted surgery versus (62.2±11.7) min during conventional surgery. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( t=3.53, P=0.020). Neither group showed noticeable resected bone shifting or soft tissue drooping. One patient in the conventional surgery group had bone nonunion on the right zygoma and partial absorption of the left zygomatic bone. The incidence of asymmetry in the computer-assisted group was 3.8% (1/26, surgical correction was not required), and 33.3% in the conventional surgery group (3/9, one patient required surgical correction). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=6.179, P=0.046). Patients’ satisfaction in the computer-assisted group was 100% (26/26), and 78% (7/9) in the conventional surgery group ( χ2=7.929, P=0.019). Comparisons between the postoperative CT and preoperative simulation CT images showed that the position deviation of the resected bones was (0.21 ± 0.19) mm. Conclusions:In the present study, improved precision of zygomatic bone resection and bone setback was achieved in reduction malarplasty by using the angled double L-shaped osteotomies with computer assistance. Moreover, complication occurrences (asymmetry, bone nonunion etc.) were significantly decreased. Also, patients’ expectation was better achieved with this method.

The Importance of the Mortice and Tenon Joint on the Zygomatic Arch in Reduction Malarplasty-a Retrospective Study.

The L-shaped Zygomatic Reduction with Oblique or Vertical Resection: Which One is the Optimal Choice?

The Spatial Relationship Between Coronoid Process and Zygomatic Complex after Reduction Malarplasty.

Comparison of three techniques of reduction malarplasty in zygomaticus and massateric biomechanical changes and relevant complications.

Compared Study of Asian Reduction Malarplasty

Reduction Malarplasty With A New L-Shaped Osteotomy Through An Intraoral Approach: Retrospective Study Of 418 Cases

Reduction Malarplasty Using a Modified L-shaped Osteotomy

Three-dimensional analysis of zygomatic change after L-shaped reduction malarplasty with bone setback or resection

Clinical Study of Reduction Plasty of Mala and Zygoma

The accuracy of virtual surgical planning assisted management for L-shaped reduction malarplasty: A retrospective study

Modification of surgical technique in isolated zygomatic arch fracture repair: seven case studies.

A Novel Technique for Reduction Malarplasty by Inward Displacement of Infractured Zygomatic Arch Without Fixation.

Influence of the maxillary sinus exposure in reduction malarplasty with an L-shaped osteotomy.

[CLINICAL STUDY ON ZYGOMATIC SPINDLE-SHAPED OSTEOTOMY AND INTERNAL PUSH OF TITANIUM SCREW ANCHOR IN TREATMENT OF PROMINENT MALAR].

Three-dimensional Radiographic Assessment of Different Fixation Methods Stability after L-Shaped Osteotomy Reduction Malarplasty: A Comparative Retrospective Study.

Reduction Malarplasty With Subperiosteal Lift Via a Single Limited Temporal Incision

Computer assisted reduction malarplasty using angled double L-shaped osteotomies

Recent progress in malarplasty

Temporal Augmentation Effect of Reduction Malarplasty: Application of our Bracing Technique with Zygomatic Arch Elevation

Comparison of Reduction Osteotomy from Different Surgical Approach in Zygoma

Reduction of Prominent Malar Complex