Neuroprotection with hypothermic reperfusion and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation - A randomized controlled animal trial of prolonged ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest in rats
Ingrid Magnet,Alexandra-Maria Stommel,Christoph Schriefl,Matthias Mueller,Michael Poppe,Juergen Grafeneder,Christoph Testori,Andreas Janata,Andreas Schober,Daniel Grassmann,Wilhelm Behringer,Wolfgang Weihs,Michael Holzer,Sandra Hoegler,Florian Ettl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X241281485
2024-09-09
Abstract:Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) facilitates resuscitation with immediate and precise temperature control. This study aimed to determine the optimal reperfusion temperature to minimize neurological damage after ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (VFCA). Twenty-four rats were randomized (n = 8 per group) to normothermia (NT = 37°C), mild hypothermia (MH = 33°C) or moderate hypothermia (MOD = 27°C). The rats were subjected to 10 minutes of VFCA, before 15 minutes of ECPR at their respective target temperature. After ECPR weaning, rats in the MOD group were rapidly rewarmed to 33°C, and temperature maintained at 33°C (MH/MOD) or 37°C (NT) for 12 hours before slow rewarming to normothermia (MH/MOD). The primary outcome was 30-day survival with overall performance category (OPC) 1 or 2 (1 = normal, 2 = slight disability, 3 = severe disability, 4 = comatose, 5 = dead). Secondary outcomes included awakening rate (OPC ≤ 3) and neurological deficit score (NDS, from 0 = normal to 100 = brain dead). The survival rate did not differ between reperfusion temperatures (NT = 25%, MH = 63%, MOD = 38%, p = 0.301). MH had the lowest NDS (NT = 4[IQR 3-4], MH = 2[1-2], MOD = 5[3-5], p = 0.044) and highest awakening rate (NT = 25%, MH = 88%, MOD = 75%, p = 0.024). In conclusion, ECPR with 33°C reperfusion did not statistically significantly improve survival after VFCA when compared with 37°C or 27°C reperfusion but was neuroprotective as measured by awakening rate and neurological function.