Nitrous Oxide‐Oxygen Mixture During Burn Wound Dressing: A Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Study
Yuxiang Li,Han Wang,Haihong Tang,Yinsheng Wu,Tianlan Lu,Jian‐Qiang Yu,Y G Li,Zhaofan Xia,Jijun Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12061
2013-01-01
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Abstract:In China, there are 5–10 million burns victims each year 1. Painful procedures are frequently required during treatment of burns wounds. Uncontrolled burns dressing pain induced anxiety and reluctance by patients to participate in their wound care and rehabilitation and is difficult to predict from wounds 2. Previous studies have shown that pain suffered by burns survivors during dressing change is untreated and poorly managed due to the fear of adverse effects of opioids analgesics in both physicians and patients, lack of burns pain management guidelines, and the assistance of an anesthetist. Some healthcare providers in burns centers are also troubled by the dilemma of side-effects of opioids analgesics and patients' rights to freedom from pain. They stated their willingness to control burns dressing pain 3, 4. However, dressing change analgesia is a difficult problem because of the requirements of intense, but short-duration analgesia 5, 6. An equimolar nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture (NOOM) inhalation, available as a portable gas cylinder, has a rapid effect that ceases immediately when not in use. The mixture leads to conscious sedation, that is, analgesia without anesthesia and is tranquilizing. The absorption and elimination by the pulmonary route are very quick, and this results in a very rapid clinical effect. The drug has a low solubility in blood and tissues. The time to obtain the medium of the saturation level is 5 min, and 5 h is required for total saturation 7. It is unlike the operatortitrated 70% maximum nitrous oxide⁄oxygen mixture delivered by a continuous flow system in Zier et al.'s study 8, 9. The latter requires specialist training and machinery that is not typically available in the burns dressing setting. NOOM has been used for a long time in pediatric, obstetric, and emergency services to provide analgesia during brief, painful procedures. The feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of use in burns dressing pain management have not been studied. This study aims to test the safety and analgesic effect of NOOM to define its place in the analgesic strategy during burns wounds dressing. Patient eligibility, recruitment, consent, and randomization was previously reported 4. The ethical approval from the Hospital Ethics Committee (CHEC2011-105) of each participating burns center was obtained. In total, 240 patients (male, n = 128; female, n = 112) aged sixteen to sixty-five (mean age 30.3 ± 12.8) who were eligible for inclusion were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to receive the usual pain treatment+oxygen (UTO, n = 60) and usual pain treatment +NOOM intervention (UTN, n = 180), respectively, 2 min before dressing, based on the current clinical practice, from October 2011 to September 2012. Physiological parameters including blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), digital oxygen saturation (SpO2), and acceptance of both health care providers' and patients' were considered as secondary outcomes. All these parameters were taken 2 min prior to intervention, during dressing, immediately after dressing and 10 min after dressing. A video and audio record were taken individually for later communication, coding, and outcome analysis. Other characteristics including sex, age, and total burn area of body surface (TBSA) were recorded as well. Rescue analgesic was recorded. SPSS 17.0 was used for statistical analysis. Comparison for baseline characteristics between two sets of patients was performed with ANOVA for continuous parameters followed by univariate analyses for analyzing the results of VAS, C-BSPAS, and physiological parameters. Mann–Whitney analysis was used for acceptance and Chi-Square test for age, sex. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In this study, pain severity was assessed with VAS (visual analog scale [zero to ten] on the Changhai Pain Scale, where zero stands for no pain and ten for unbearable pain. The scale chosen for pain assessment was categorized as mild [VAS 0 to 4.0], moderate [VAS 4.1 to 6.0], and severe [VAS > 6.0]). Analysis of pain severity (VAS) during dressing demonstrated a significant decrease in NOOM-treated patients with 1.65 ± 1.34 versus 9.39 ± 0.74 in controls (P < 0.01). The% C-BSPAS for each group was obtained by calculating the total score and dividing by 5. In contrast, NOOM-treated patients had markedly decreased C-BSPAS when compared to the controls. Indeed the % C-BSPAS in control patients was 74.6 ± 12.8% compared with 9.38 ± 15.0% in NOOM-treated patients. Uncontrolled burns dressing pain can lead to tissue hypoxia, create biochemical and metabolic disturbances, release toxic products, and depress the cardiovascular system causing tachycardia and high blood pressure 11. Analysis of secondary outcomes showed a significant decrease heart rate, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and a significant increase SPO2 in NOOM-treated patients with 110 ± 23.0 versus 130 ± 27.2, 115 ± 13.7 versus 133 ± 18.9, 71.2 ± 10,1 versus 76.04 ± 8.94 and 99.6 ± 0.68 versus 95.8 ± 3.33 in controls (P < 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, a significant increase in satisfaction with current burns dressing pain management was noted in UTN compared with the UTO (Z = −12.1, P < 0.01) as well as the acceptance of NOOM from both patients and health professionals. In this study, it was found that treatment with nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture improved primary outcomes with significantly reduction in burn dressing pain and burn pain related anxiety. The result also demonstrated great acceptance from both healthcare professionals and patients who experienced the treatment of nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture in burn dressing pain. The result proved that the model of analgesia for burn pain controlled by nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture is successful. It could potentially be implemented widely in hospital and prehospital setting and improve patients' satisfaction and quality of life in China. The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (70973136,30960506 & 81160524), Ningxia Science and Technology Research Program [2012]17. We thank Dr.Margaret for editing of our manuscript. The authors declare no conflict of interest.