Abstract:Observed choices between options representing a relative vice and a relative virtue have commonly been used as a measure of eating self-control in the literature. However, even though self-control operations may manifest across the post-choice consumption stage, either similarly or in different ways from the choice stage, most prior research has ignored consumption quantity of the chosen option. While the behavior of choosing a virtue instead of a vice does manifest self-control, we examine how this plays out in post-choice consumption. Specifically, we find that when processing resources are limited, after having chosen a virtue food, unrestrained eaters ironically consumed greater quantities and therefore more calories than restrained eaters (Study 1). This reflects more persistent self-control in the post-choice consumption stage among restrained eaters than unrestrained eaters, and occurs because choosing a virtue lowers accessibility of the self-control goal among unrestrained eaters relative to restrained eaters (Study 2), thereby increasing intake of the virtuous food. In contrast, subsequent to having chosen a vice, unrestrained eaters and restrained eaters did not show any such difference in intake (Study 1) or goal accessibility (Study 2). Together, these results reveal that persistence of self-control in the post-choice consumption stage depends on individuals' dietary restraint and their initial exercise of self-control in the choice decision. The mere act of choosing a virtue satisfies unrestrained eaters' self-control goal and leads to increased food intake, whereas the same act keeps the same goal activated among restrained eaters who reduce intake of the chosen virtue. Put differently, persistent self-control across choice and quantity decisions is observed only when those with a dietary goal show successful self-control enactment in the choice stage. We therefore highlight that the operation of self-control can be dynamic within a consumption episode, and thus, choice and post-choice quantity are both informative of self-control.

Belief in Control: Voluntary Choice Enhances Subsequent Task Performance under Undefeated Choice-Outcome Causation

The Benefit of Making Voluntary Choices Generalizes Across Multiple Effectors

Volition motivates cognitive performance at the response-execution level by attenuating task-irrelevant motor activations

Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices

My choice, my actions: self-determination, not instrumental value of outcomes enhances outcome monitoring during learning

Control Deprivation and Styles of Thinking

The Effect of Decision Strategy on Self-Control Choice

The benefit of choice on task performance: Reduced difficulty effects in free-choice versus forced-choice tasks

Is providing choices always a good thing? the backfire effect of providing choices on competence restoration

Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices

How perception of control shapes decision making

The Postdictive Effect of Choice Reflects the Modulation of Attention on Choice

The Shifting Preference For Contingent Rewards In Goal Pursuit

Dynamics of self-control during choice and post-choice consumption quantity

When Thinking Beats Doing: the Role of Optimistic Expectations in Goal-Based Choice

Intention Beyond Desire: Commitment in Human Action

The Self-Control Irony: Desire for Self-Control Limits Exertion of Self-Control in Demanding Settings

How choice modifies preference: neural correlates of choice justification.

Beliefs about self-control

Influence of Previous Choice and Outcome in a Two-Alternative Decision-Making Task

Influence of voluntary action and outcome valence on the sense of agency