The basic reproduction number (R 0 ) of ebola virus disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Basilua Andre Muzembo,Kei Kitahara,Debmalya Mitra,Ngangu Patrick Ntontolo,Nlandu Roger Ngatu,Ayumu Ohno,Januka Khatiwada,Shanta Dutta,Shin-Ichi Miyoshi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102685

IF: 20.441

2024-01-05

Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease

Abstract:Background Ebola virus disease (Ebola) is highly pathogenic, transmissible, and often deadly, with debilitating consequences. Superspreading within a cluster is also possible. In this study, we aim to document Ebola basic reproduction number (R 0 ): the average number of new cases associated with an Ebola case in a completely susceptible population. Methods We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies published between 1976 and February 27, 2023. We also manually searched the reference lists of the reviewed studies to identify additional studies. We included studies that reported R 0 during Ebola outbreaks in Africa. We excluded studies that reported only the effective reproduction number (R t ). ing data from included studies was performed using a pilot-tested standard form. Two investigators reviewed the studies, extracted the data, and assessed quality. The pooled R 0 was determined by a random-effects meta-analysis. R 0 was stratified by country. We also estimated the theoretically required immunization coverage to reach herd-immunity using the formula of (1-1/R 0 )×100 %. Results The search yielded 2042 studies. We included 53 studies from six African countries in the systematic review providing 97 Ebola mean R 0 estimates. 27 (with 46 data points) studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled mean Ebola R 0 was 1.95 (95 % CI 1.74–2.15), with high heterogeneity (I 2 = 99.99 %; τ 2 = 0.38; and p 0.001). Mean Ebola R 0 values ranged from 1.2 to 10.0 in Nigeria, 1.1 to 7 in Guinea, 1.14 to 8.33 in Sierra Leone, 1.13 to 5 in Liberia, 1.2 to 5.2 in DR Congo, 1.34 to 2.7 in Uganda, and from 1.40 to 2.55 for all West African countries combined. Pooled mean Ebola R 0 was 9.38 (95 % CI 4.16–14.59) in Nigeria, 3.31 (95 % CI 2.30–4.32) in DR Congo, 2.0 (95 % CI 1.25–2.76) in Uganda, 1.83 (95 % CI 1.61–2.05) in Liberia, 1.73 (95 % CI 1.47–2.0) in Sierra Leonne, and 1.44 (95 % CI 1.29–1.60) in Guinea. In theory, 50 % of the population needs to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity, assuming that Ebola vaccine would be 100 % effective. Conclusions Ebola R 0 varies widely across countries. Ebola has a much wider R 0 range than is often claimed (1.3–2.0). It is possible for an Ebola index case to infect more than two susceptible individuals.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health