Complete Resection of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy Adherent to the Inferior Vena Cava by Laparoscopy

An Tong,Yumei Pu,Jiatian Ye,Xiaorong Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.03.009
IF: 4.314
2022-01-01
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Abstract:Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) is an uncommon type of ectopic pregnancy, accounting for only 1% [ 1 Parker VL Srinivas M. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 294: 19-27 Crossref PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar ]. Laparotomy is recommended for REP removal because it is difficult to control bleeding and remove lesions completely with laparoscopy [ 2 Ouassour S Filali AA Raiss M et al. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and therapeutic challenges. Case Rep Surg. 2017; 20179871865 PubMed Google Scholar ]. However, few successful laparoscopic resections have been reported in recent years [ 3 Hou Q Xin L Jian L Pan J Chen L Song W. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021; 47: 1186-1190 Crossref PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar , 4 OuYang Z Wei S Wu J Wan Z Zhang M Zhong B. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: a literature review of reported cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 259: 113-118 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar ]. To share the experience of diagnosis and surgery, we present a rare case of REP adherent to the inferior vena cava, which was completely resected by laparoscopy. Regarding "Complete Resection of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy Adherent to the Inferior Vena Cava by Laparoscopy"Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyVol. 29Issue 8PreviewTong et al [1] shot an excellent article describing an accurate surgical dissection of a retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (EP) on the inferior vena cava and the approach to treating the unusual EP site. This article asserts how the laparoscopic approach represents safe and effective management of unconventional EP sites. We considered that, in this context, it would have been interesting to also evaluate a recent work in which we described a case of laparoscopically treated retroperitoneal pregnancy [2]. Full-Text PDF Authors' ReplyJournal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyVol. 29Issue 8PreviewDi Lorenzo et al [1] suggested that it was important to recognize the retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) early and identify its risk factors, such as endometriosis. However, there was no sign of endometriosis in our case, but consolidation of the right fallopian tube lumen that was found suggested that the dysfunction of transportation for fertilized eggs might lead to ectopic implantation [2]. There are 3 main hypotheses of REP: (1) the retroperitoneal sinus hypothesis, (2) the peritoneal erosion hypothesis, and (3) the intralymphatic migration hypothesis [3]; our case seemed to meet the second hypothesis given that the fertilized eggs were unable to enter the uterine cavity and were implanted in the retroperitoneum instead. Full-Text PDF
What problem does this paper attempt to address?