Clinical Productivity and Patient Complexity of Academic Rhinologists: An Analysis of Medicare Metrics

Michael J. Warn,Sina J. Torabi,Benjamin F. Bitner,Daniella Chan,Theodore V. Nguyen,Edward C. Kuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31437
IF: 2.97
2024-04-11
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:The variation in complexity of patients treated between physicians is understudied. According to Medicare metrics and HCC risk, rhinologists with greater years in practice and full professorial rank treat less complex patients and are reimbursed more per service than junior colleagues. Introduction Current data regarding reimbursement trends in Medicare services and the complexity of patients treated as physicians' progress in their academic career are conflicting. In otolaryngology, there are no data examining these metrics. Methods Medicare services, reimbursement, and patient complexity risk scores (based on hierarchical condition category coding) of US rhinology fellowship‐trained faculty were stratified and compared by rank and years in practice. Results A cohort of 209 rhinologists were included. Full professors were reimbursed more per service than assistant professors ( 491.69–1052.46] vs. 429.91–853.07] p = 0.045) and had lower risk scores (1.37 [1.26–1.52] vs. 1.49 [1.29–1.68], p = 0.013). Full professors had similar risk scores to associate professors (1.47 [1.25–1.64], p = 0.14). Full professors ( 491.69–1,052.46], p
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?