Abstract:Background: While home dialysis therapies are more cost effective and may offer improved health-related quality of life, uptake compared to in-center hemodialysis remains low. Objective: To test whether a web-based interactive health communication application (IHCA) compared to usual care would increase home dialysis use. Design: Randomized control trial Setting: Patients were recruited from 3 multidisciplinary kidney clinics across Ontario, Canada (Hamilton, Kingston, London). Patients: We included adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) followed in multidisciplinary kidney clinics. Patients who had not completed dialysis modality education, who did not have access to a home computer or the internet, who had significant hearing or vision impairment, who could not read/write/speak English, who had a medical contraindication for home dialysis, or who had selected conservative kidney care were excluded. Measurements: The primary outcome was any use of home dialysis (peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis) within 90 days of dialysis initiation. Secondary outcomes were social support, decision conflict and dialysis knowledge measured at baseline, 6 months and 1 year. Methods: Eligible patients were randomized to either usual care or the IHCA in addition to usual care in a 1:1 ratio. As part of usual care, all patients received education about dialysis modalities and kidney transplantation delivered by clinic nurses according to local practices. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence in randomly permuted block sizes, stratified by site, and allocation occurred using sequentially numbered sealed, opaque envelopes. Participants, care providers, and outcome assessors were not blinded to the intervention. All analyses were performed blinded using an intention to treat approach. We estimated the effect of the ICHA on the odds of the primary outcome using unadjusted logistic regression models. Linear mixed models for repeated measures over time were used to analyze the impact of the IHCA on the secondary outcomes of interest. Results: We randomized 140 (usual care, n = 71; IHCA, n = 69) out of a planned 264 patients (mean [SD] age 61 [14.5] years, 65% men). Among patients randomized to the IHCA group that completed 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits, 56.8% and 71.4%, respectively, had not accessed the IHCA website within the past month. There were 23 (32.4%) and 26 (37.7%) patients in the usual care and IHCA groups who received a home dialysis therapy within 90 days of dialysis initiation (odds ratio, OR = 1.3, 95% CI = [0.6-2.5], P = .5). Among the 78 patients who initiated dialysis (n = 38 usual care, n = 40 IHCA), 60.5% and 65% in the usual care and IHCA groups received a home therapy within 90 days of dialysis initiation (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = [0.5-3.0], P = .7). Secondary outcomes did not differ by intervention group over time. Limitations: The trial was underpowered due to poor recruitment and use of the IHCA was low. Conclusions: We did not find evidence of a difference in home dialysis uptake with IHCA use, but our analyses were notably underpowered. The incorporation of greater patient engagement, qualitative research and design research, and pilot implementation may help future evaluations of strategies to improve home dialysis uptake. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01403454, registration date: Jul 21, 2011

Exploring Agreement and Feasibility Between Virtual Home Visits and In-Person Home Visits for Peritoneal Dialysis Patients—a Paired Study

Exploration of patients’ preference for modalities of care among peritoneal dialysis patients in Singapore: a single-center experience

Self-care or Assisted PD: Development of a New Approach to Evaluate Manual Peritoneal Dialysis Practice Ability.

The impact and feasibility of a brief, virtual, educational intervention for home healthcare professionals on Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders: pilot study of I SEE PD Home

Scheduling of Remote Monitoring for Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

The Use of a Novel Virtual Reality Training Tool for Peritoneal Dialysis: Qualitative Assessment Among Health Care Professionals

Burden of kidney disease among patients with peritoneal dialysis versus conventional in-centre haemodialysis: A randomised, non-inferiority trial

The WISHED Randomized Controlled Trial: Impact of an Interactive Health Communication Application on Home Dialysis Use in People With Chronic Kidney Disease

Longitudinal Trends in Quality of Life and Physical Function in Frail Older Dialysis Patients: A Comparison of Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis and In-Center Hemodialysis

Remote Patient Management in Peritoneal Dialysis: An Answer to an Unmet Clinical Need

Using Remote Technology to Engage Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases in a Home Exercise Program: A Pilot Study

Effects of a customized diet education program using a mobile instant messenger for people undergoing peritoneal dialysis: A feasibility test

Barriers and facilitators for the adoption of peritoneal dialysis: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies

Physician Knowledge and Attitudes Toward the Adoption of Peritoneal Dialysis in the Treatment of Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease

Rationale for a home dialysis virtual ward: design and implementation

Unveiling the Intricacies: Exploring Stepwise Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis in a Single-Center Setting

Outcomes of Remote Patient Monitoring for Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Variations in provider practices in remote patient monitoring on peritoneal dialysis in the USA and Canada

Telemedicine and Clinical Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis: A Propensity-Matched Study

Physical Function and Physical Activity in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

MO700: Outcomes of Remote Patient Monitoring among Peritoneal Dialysis Population in the Covid-19 ERA