Can Practitioners and Analysts Join Forces to Address Largescale Environmental Challenges?

Young Oran R.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-020-00001-8
2021-01-01
Global Public Policy and Governance
Abstract:Efforts to promote collaboration between practitioners and analysts in establishing and administering governance systems to address largescale environmental challenges regularly fall victim to a two cultures problem. As a popular saying has it: analysts look at issues from 30,000 feet, while practitioners are down in the weeds. This article considers prospects for overcoming this problem. Using the concept of the policy cycle as a framing device, it examines contributions practitioners and analysts can make during the stages of agenda formation, collective choice, implementation and administration, and evaluation and reform. The article then turns to practical steps for overcoming the barriers to productive engagement between the two communities caused by the lack of a common language for thinking about specific needs for governance and by the influence of negative stereotypes about each other’s contributions that color the day-to-day activities of practitioners and analysts alike. The empirical focus of the article is on efforts to create effective governance systems to address largescale environmental challenges. But many features of the two cultures problem are generic. The ideas this article articulates may apply as well to efforts to foster collaboration between practitioners and analysts in other issue domains.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?