The measurable angular distribution of Λ b 0 → Λ c + → Λ 0 π + τ − → π − v τ v ¯ τ $$ {\Lambda}_b^0\to {\Lambda}_c^{+}\left(\to {\Lambda}^0{\pi}^{+}\right){\tau}^{-}\left(\to {\pi}^{-}{v}_{\tau}\right){\overline{v}}_{\tau } $$ decay

Hu Quan-Yi,Li Xin-Qiang,Yang Ya-Dong,Zheng Dong-Hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2021)183
IF: 6.379
2021-01-01
Journal of High Energy Physics
Abstract:In $$ {\Lambda}_b^0\to {\Lambda}_c^{+}\left(\to {\Lambda}^0{\pi}^{+}\right){\tau}^{-}{\overline{v}}_{\tau } $$ decay, the solid angle of the final-state particle τ− cannot be determined precisely since the decay products of the τ− include an undetected ντ. Therefore, the angular distribution of this decay cannot be measured. In this work, we construct a measurable angular distribution by considering the subsequent decay τ− → π−ντ. The full cascade decay is $$ {\Lambda}_b^0\to {\Lambda}_c^{+}\left(\to {\Lambda}^0{\pi}^{+}\right){\tau}^{-}\left(\to {\pi}^{-}{v}_{\tau}\right){\overline{v}}_{\tau } $$ . The three-momenta of the final-state particles Λ0, π+, and π− can be measured. Considering all Lorentz structures of the new physics (NP) effective operators and an unpolarized initial Λb state, the five-fold differential angular distribution can be expressed in terms of ten angular observables $$ {\mathcal{K}}_i\left({q}^2,{E}_{\pi}\right) $$ . By integrating over some of the five kinematic parameters, we define a number of observables, such as the Λc spin polarization $$ {P}_{\Lambda_c}\left({q}^2\right) $$ and the forward-backward asymmetry of π− meson AFB(q2), both of which can be represented by the angular observables $$ {\hat{\mathcal{K}}}_i\left({q}^2\right) $$ . We provide numerical results for the entire set of the angular observables $$ {\hat{\mathcal{K}}}_i\left({q}^2\right) $$ and $$ {\hat{\mathcal{K}}}_i $$ both within the Standard Model and in some NP scenarios, which are a variety of best-fit solutions in seven different NP hypotheses. We find that the NP which can resolve the anomalies in $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{v}}_{\tau } $$ decays has obvious effects on the angular observables $$ {\hat{\mathcal{K}}}_i\left({q}^2\right) $$ , except $$ {\hat{\mathcal{K}}}_{1 ss}\left({q}^2\right) $$ and $$ {\hat{\mathcal{K}}}_{1 cc}\left({q}^2\right) $$ .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?