Prognostic nomogram of overall survival for radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a population study based on the SEER database and an external cohort
Lijun Chen,Qiaoyuan Wu,Jia Fu,Mengjie Jiang,Jialin Qiu,Jiaomei Tao,Litong Lin,Shenshen Chen,Yi Wu,Zhengqiang Yang,Jianxu Li,Shixiong Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1371409
2024-09-02
Abstract:Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To screen patients who benefit most from RT, a nomogram for survival prediction of RT based on a large sample of patients with HCC was created and validated. Methods: A total of 2,252 cases collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were separated into a training or an internal validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio (n = 1,565:650). An external validation cohort of cases from our institute was obtained (n = 403). LASSO regression and Cox analyses were adopted to develop a nomogram for survival prediction. The decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curve, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (TROCs) demonstrated the reliability of the predictive model. Results: For patients with HCC who received RT, the analyses revealed that the independent survival prediction factors were T stage {T2 vs. T1, hazard ratio (HR) =1.452 [95% CI, 1.195-1.765], p < 0.001; T3 vs. T1, HR = 1.469 [95% CI, 1.168-1.846], p < 0.001; T4 vs. T1, HR = 1.291 [95% CI, 0.951-1.754], p = 0.101}, N stage (HR = 1.555 [95% CI, 1.338-1.805], p < 0.001), M stage (HR = 3.007 [95% CI, 2.645-3.418], p < 0.001), max tumor size (>2 and ≤5 vs. ≤2 cm, HR = 1.273 [95% CI, 0.992-1.633], p = 0.057; >5 and ≤10 vs. ≤2 cm, HR = 1.625 [95% CI, 1.246-2.118], p < 0.001; >10 vs. ≤2 cm, HR = 1.784 [95% CI, 1.335-2.385], p < 0.001), major vascular invasion (MVI) (HR = 1.454 [95% CI, 1.028-2.057], p = 0.034), alpha fetoprotein (AFP) (HR = 1.573 [95% CI, 1.315-1.882], p < 0.001), and chemotherapy (HR = 0.511 [95% CI, 0.454-0.576], p < 0.001). A nomogram constructed with these prognostic factors demonstrated outstanding predictive accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) in the training cohort for predicting overall survival (OS) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 0.824 (95% CI, 0.803-0.846), 0.824 (95% CI, 0.802-0.845), 0.816 (95% CI, 0.792-0.840), and 0.820 (95% CI, 0.794-0.846), respectively. The AUCs were similar in the other two cohorts. The DCA and calibration curve demonstrated the reliability of the predictive model. Conclusion: For patients who have been treated with RT, a nomogram constructed with T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor size, MVI, AFP, and chemotherapy has good survival prediction ability.