Improving Quality of Counterexamples in Model Checking Via Automated Planning

Xu Lu,Cong Tian,Bin Yu,Zhenhua Duan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/qrs54544.2021.00079
2021-01-01
Abstract:There is a wide agreement that model checking and automated planning (planning for short) are closely related fields. Planning is the task of finding a sequence of appropriate moves that achieves a goal. Model checking aims to prove or disprove a system model that satisfies a given property which is often specified by temporal logics. In this paper we investigate the application of advanced planning techniques to model checking. To this end, a system model is expressed by means of a planning model, and temporal logic property can be treated as a special form of planning goal, i.e., Temporally Extended Goal (TEG). Therefore, the model checking task can be reduced into a planning scheme what we call planning with TEG. In order to utilize the state-of-the-art planners, we further propose two novel compilation methods to translate a planning with TEG problem into a classical planning problem and a non-deterministic planning one respectively. The obtained valid plans in planning just correspond to the counterexamples in model checking. We provide detailed evaluations of our approach on a series of benchmarks. The experimental results are encouraging, showing that existing planners can provide significant improvements in the quality of the counterexamples compared with the model checkers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?