Staged-Air Ratio Optimization Within a Cold Small-Scale Model for a MBEL Down-Fired Pulverized-Coal 300 MW (electrical) Utility Boiler
Zhengqi Li,Min Kuang,Qunyi Zhu,Pengfei Yang,Yuangang Wu,Shantian Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef1006879
IF: 4.6541
2010-01-01
Energy & Fuels
Abstract:To eliminate large combustion differences between zones near the front and rear walls, as well as to decrease the high carbon content in the fly ash in Mitsui Babcock energy limited (MBEL) down-fired pulverized-coal boilers, a 45 degrees staged-air declination method was put forward in our previous work. To establish optimal staged-air ratio settings with this staged-air declination, cold airflow experiments were conducted within a small-scale model of a M BEL down-fired pulverized-coal 300 MW (electrical) utility boiler. We investigated the aerodynamic field at six different staged-air ratio settings of 0, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30%. At the setting of 0%, an essentially symmetric W-shaped flow field appeared in the lower furnace, although some asymmetries arose in the dry bottom hopper and zones near the staged-air port outlet. For settings of 10, 15, 20, and 25%, a well-formed symmetric W-shaped flow field appeared in the lower furnace, and the extent of the flow field symmetry along the furnace center in the zones near front and rear walls increased with staged-air ratio. At the highest setting of 30%, a deflected flow field developed in the lower furnace, although this airflow is redirected higher up the rear wall than for the front wall. Concurrently, downward airflow washed over both front and rear walls and by increasing the staged-air ratio washing at these walls was enhanced. At all settings except for 0 and 30%, certain cross-sectional longitudinal-velocity components, turbulence intensities in the staged-air zone, and the decay of the fuel-rich coal/air mixture all displayed well-defined symmetries along the furnace center in the zones near front and rear walls. Differences in penetration depths near front and rear walls initially increased only slightly but then deepened sharply as the staged-air ratio increased, although the differences began to recede at the ratio of 25%. To establish a symmetric flow field along with an appropriate airflow reach, an optimal setting of 20% was found for the staged-air ratio.