Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism

Lauren A. Weiss,Yiping Shen,Joshua M. Korn,Dan E. Arking,David T. Miller,Ragnheidur Fossdal,Evald Saemundsen,Hreinn Stefansson,Manuel A. R. Ferreira,Todd Green,Orah S. Piatt,Douglas M. Ruderfer,Christopher A. Walsh,David Altshuler,Aravinda Chakravarti,Rudolph E. Tanzi,Kari Stefansson,Susan L. Santangelo,James F. Gusella,Pamela Sklar,Bai-Lin Wu,Mark J. Daly
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000316305.61461.6f
2008-01-01
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Abstract:Twin and family studies have shown that autism is approximately 90% heritable, and in about 10% of patients, the disorder can be explained by genetic syndromes and known chromosomal anomalies. The present study is an initial component of a genome-wide associational analysis of families from the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE). Two novel algorithms were used to search for recurrent copy-number variations in genotype data from 751 multiplex families with autism. Particular recurrent de novo events were further examined in clinical test data from Children's Hospital Boston and in a large population study carried out in Iceland. Among the AGRE families studied were 5 instances of a de novo deletion of 593 kb on chromosome 16p11.2. Comparative genomic hybridization studies demonstrated the identical deletion in 5 of 512 children referred to Children's Hospital Boston because of developmental delay, mental retardation, or suspected autism spectrum disorder. It was also observed in 3 of 299 individuals with autism in the Icelandic population. Two of 18,834 unscreened Icelandic control subjects also carried the deletion. The reciprocal duplication of this region was observed in 7 affected individuals in AGRE families and in 4 of the children from Children's Hospital. The duplication appeared to be a high-penetrance risk factor. The novel recurrent microdeletion and reciprocal microduplication identified in this study carry with them substantial susceptibility to autism, accounting for approximately 1% of cases. The lack of other notable recurrent events suggests that only a fraction of cases of familial idiopathic autism may be explained by large de novo copy-number mutations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?