χCJ decays to h+h-h0

S. B. Athar,R. Patel,V. Potlia,John Yelton,P. Rubin,C. Cawlfield,B. I. Eisenstein,I. Karliner,Dong-Hyun Kim,N. Lowrey,P. Naik,Mats A Selen,E. J. White,James E Wiss,R. E. Mitchell,M. R. Shepherd,D. Z. Besson,T. K. Pedlar,D. Cronin-Hennessy,K. Y. Gao,J. Hietala,Yuichi Kubota,T. Klein,B. W. Lang,Ron Poling,A. W. Scott,A. Smith,P. Zweber,Sean A Dobbs,Z. Metreveli,Kamal K. Seth,Amiran Tomaradze,J. A. Ernst,K. M. Ecklund,Horst Severini,W. Love,V. Savinov,O. Aquines,Z. Li,A. Lopez,S. Mehrabyan,H. Mendez,J. E. Ramirez,G. S. Huang,D. H. Miller,V. Pavlunin,B. Sanghi,I. P.J. Shipsey,B. Xin,G. S. Adams,M. Anderson,J. P. Cummings,I. Danko,D. Hu,B. Moziak,J. Napolitano,Q. He,J. Insler,H. Muramatsu,C. S. Park,E. H. Thorndike,F. Yang,T. E. Coan,Y. S. Gao,Marina Artuso,S. Blusk,J. Butt,Li Jingyuan,N. Menaa,R. Mountain,S. Nisar,K. Randrianarivony,R. Sia,Tomasz Skwarnicki,Sheldon Stone,Jing Wang,K. Zhang,G. Bonvicini,D. Cinabro,M. Dubrovin,A. Lincoln,D. M. Asner,K. W. Edwards,R. A. Briere,T. Ferguson,G. Tatishvili,Hans J. Vogel,M. E. Watkins,Jonathan L. Rosner,N. E. Adam,J. P. Alexander,D. G. Cassel,J. E. Duboscq,R. Ehrlich,L. Fields,L. K. Gibbons,R. Gray,S. W. Gray,D. L. Hartill,B. K. Heltsley,D. Hertz,C. D. Jones,J. Kandaswamy,D. L. Kreinick,V. E. Kuznetsov,H. Mahlke-Krüger,Peter Onyisi,J. R. Patterson,D. Peterson,J. Pivarski,D. Riley,Anders Ryd,A. J. Sadoff,H. Schwarthoff,X. Shi,S. Stroiney,Werner Sun,T. Wilksen,M. Weinberger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.75.032002
IF: 5.407
2007-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:Using a sample of 3x10{sup 6} {psi}(2S) decays recorded by the CLEO detector, we study three-body decays of the {chi}{sub c0}, {chi}{sub c1}, and {chi}{sub c2} produced in radiative decays of the {psi}(2S). We consider the final states {pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup -}{eta}, K{sup +}K{sup -}{eta}, pp{eta}, {pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup -}{eta}{sup '}, K{sup +}K{sup -}{pi}{sup 0}, pp{pi}{sup 0}, {pi}{sup +}K{sup -}K{sub S}{sup 0}, and K{sup +}p{lambda}, measuring branching fractions or placing upper limits. For {chi}{sub c1}{yields}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup -}{eta}, K{sup +}K{sup -}{pi}{sup 0}, and {pi}{sup +}K{sup -}K{sub S}{sup 0} our observed samples are large enough to indicate the largest contributions to the substructure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?