IDDF2018-ABS-0145 Comparative Analysis of Clinical Features of Crohn’s Disease and Primary Intestinal Lymphoma

Hui Su,Yan Jia,Yuanming Pan,Limin Zhang,Shirong Li,Jianqiu Sheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-iddfabstracts.127
2018-01-01
Abstract:Background To compare the clinical characteristics of Crohn’s disease (CD) and primary intestinal lymphoma (PIL), to find out valuable, relevant indicators for differential diagnosis. Methods The clinical, endoscopic and pathological data of 67 cases (54 cases of Crohn’s disease and 13 cases of primary intestinal lymphoma) admitted by the PLA Army General Hospital in the last seven years were analysed retrospectively. Results The average age of CD was lower than that of PIL, but the course of CD was longer than that of PIL (p<0.01). Abdominal pain, oral ulcers, perianal lesions, history of surgery (appendectomy or intestinal resection), and multi-site lesions were more common in CD than in PIL (p<0.05). Abdominal mass, abdominal distension, single-site lesion was more common in patients with PIL than in CD (p<0.05). The clinical manifestations of intestinal lymphoma were mostly mass type (53.8%), and onsets in the ileocecal junction and terminal ileum were more common (69.2%). The biopsy diagnosis rate of PIL was 92.3%, while 85.1% of CD’s pathological manifestations were non-specific inflammation. So the biopsy diagnosis rate of PIL was significantly higher than that of CD (p<0.05). Two patients were initially diagnosed with CD based on the clinical comprehensive analysis. The clinical symptoms disappeared, and the colonoscopy achieved mucosal healing after treatment. But the patients‘ symptoms repeated, and they were eventually diagnosed as PIL. Conclusions The clinical and endoscopic characteristics of Crohn’s disease (CD) and primary intestinal lymphoma (PIL) are similar, but they have their own characteristics. Therefore, the differential diagnosis is difficult. The diagnosis of CD is more supported by young, long course of the disease, abdominal pain, oral ulcers, perianal lesions, history of surgery (appendectomy, resection), and multi-site lesions. Short disease duration, abdominal mass and single-site lesion are more common in PIL. Biopsy diagnosis rate of PIL is higher than that of CD. In the case of the diagnosis of PIL after CD treatment, misdiagnosis, a combination of the two and drug induction should be considered.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?