Abstract:Since China's reform and opening up,its infrastructure has been improved dramatically,creating the so-called infrastructure miracle.As we have already known that intra-region trade costs and inter-region trade cost,which are determined by the quality of infrastructure,have crucial effects on the spatial distribution of industries across regions within a country.Adopting the footloose capital model,we investigate the effects of trade cost differences due to infrastructure quality on regional industrial agglomeration,regional gap and social welfare.The main findings of the paper are listed as follows.(1) The residents of the less developed areas will benefit both from the improvement of the intra-region infrastructure of the less developed areas and/or of the inter-region infrastructure between the developed and the less developed ones.However,the mechanisms of the two policies are different.The policy of improving the infrastructure in the less developed areas has direct and indirect effects,both of which benefit the residents within it.The direct effect is more clearly visible in the rapid improvements in the infrastructure,while the indirect effect takes more time to be fully realized.This finding explains the common phenomenon of the low utilization of the infrastructure in the backward areas.The policy of improving inter-region infrastructure benefits the residents of the less developed areas through decreasing import cost.However,when the infrastructure in developed areas is better than that in less developed areas,this kind of policy will not only widen the regional gap as industries agglomerate around developed areas,but also widen regional income inequity.A new perspective for us to consider the relationship between industrial agglomeration and regional gap is that the industrial agglomeration caused by the infrastructure differences between developed areas and less developed ones may to some extent account for the widening income gap.(2) The residents of the less developed areas will benefit from the improvement of the infrastructure as industries spread to these areas,while the residents of the developed ones may enjoy fewer welfare benefits.There is high probability that this kind of policy may cut down the total social welfare benefits when both the industrial-size gap and the infrastructure gap between regions are significant.This finding has significant implications for the central government in making policies for regional coordination.If coordinated regional development is a long term target of the central government,early investment in the infrastructure in the less developed areas is vital.If the investment is delayed until considerable gap develops between regions,an overall efficiency loss may occur and the economic development in the earlier stages will be greatly hampered.(3) The main policy implication of this paper is that the optimal policy of the central government to improve the infrastructure depends on the initial levels of industrial sizes and infrastructure of the two regions.When the size difference between regional economies is small,when the trade barriers between regions are high,and when the less developed areas have significant investment cost advantage in improving the intra-region infrastructure,the central government should choose to invest in the infrastructure in less developed areas to maximize the total social welfare. One limitation of this study is that we only assume the public expenditure on infrastructure to be exogenous.In more general and realistic situations,local governments actually rely on tax revenue to finance infrastructure investments.One interesting extension would be to introduce tax policy into our model in order to better explain the strategic behaviors of local governments and their impact on industrial agglomeration and economic development.

Understanding the green total factor energy efficiency gap between regional manufacturingdinsight from infrastructure development

Understanding the green total factor energy efficiency gap between regional manufacturing—insight from infrastructure development

Green Building Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Transportation Infrastructure in China: Based on Three-Stage Super-Efficiency SBM–DEA and Tobit Models

Infrastructure,Industrial Agglomeration and Regional Coordination

Measurement and Driving Factors of Green Total Factor Manufacturing Energy Efficiency in China

Impact of Manufacturing Agglomeration on the Green Innovation Efficiency—Spatial Effect Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data

Regional differences and evolution trends of China’s industrial green transformation

Does manufacturing agglomeration promote green productivity growth in China? Fresh evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models

How Do Financial Development and Industrial Structure Affect Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from China

Total Factor Energy Efficiency in Chinese Manufacturing Industry under Industry and Regional Heterogeneities

Toward carbon neutrality: The impact of manufacturing agglomeration on total factor energy efficiency

Do technical differences lead to a widening gap in China's regional carbon emissions efficiency? Evidence from a combination of LMDI and PDA approach

North-south regional differential decomposition and spatiotemporal dynamic evolution of China's industrial green total factor productivity

Distribution of Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity of Green Total-Factor Productivity in the Chinese Manufacturing Industry, and the Influencing Factors

Impact of changes in energy structure and industrial structure on green total factor productivity in the context of environmental protection—evidence from China

How does manufacturing agglomeration affect green economic efficiency?

Green Total-Factor Energy Efficiency of Construction Industry and Its Driving Factors: Spatial-Temporal Heterogeneity of Yangtze River Economic Belt in China

Regional differences, dynamic evolution and trend prediction of green manufacturing development levels in China

Evaluation and determinants of total unified efficiency of China's manufacturing sector under the carbon neutrality target

Research on Regional Differences and Influencing Factors of Chinese Industrial Green Technology Innovation Efficiency Based on Dagum Gini Coefficient Decomposition

Energy efficiency of the industrial sectors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: does technological gap matter?