Abstract:Gut microbes have critical roles in maintaining host physiology, but their effects on epithelial chemosensory enteroendocrine cells (EEC) remain unclear. We investigated the role that the ubiquitous commensal gut bacterium Bacteriodes thetaiotaomicron (Bt) and its major fermentation products, acetate, propionate, and succinate (APS) have in shaping EEC networks in the murine gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The distribution and numbers of EEC populations were assessed in tissues along the GIT by fluorescent immunohistochemistry in specific pathogen free (SPF), germfree (GF) mice, GF mice conventionalized by Bt or Lactobacillus reuteri (Lr), and GF mice administered APS. In parallel, we also assessed the suitability of using intestinal crypt-derived epithelial monolayer cultures for these studies. GF mice up-regulated their EEC network, in terms of a general EEC marker chromogranin A (ChrA) expression, numbers of serotonin-producing enterochromaffin cells, and both hormone-producing K- and L-cells, with a corresponding increase in serum glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels. Bt conventionalization restored EEC numbers to levels in SPF mice with regional specificity; the effects on ChrA and L-cells were mainly in the small intestine, the effects on K-cells and EC cells were most apparent in the colon. By contrast, Lr did not restore EEC networks in conventionalized GF mice. Analysis of secretory epithelial cell monolayer cultures from whole small intestine showed that intestinal monolayers are variable and with the possible exclusion of GIP expressing cells, did not accurately reflect the EEC cell makeup seen in vivo. Regarding the mechanism of action of Bt on EECs, colonization of GF mice with Bt led to the production and accumulation of acetate, propionate and succinate (APS) in the caecum and colon, which when administered at physiological concentrations to GF mice via their drinking water for 10 days mimicked to a large extent the effects of Bt in GF mice. After withdrawal of APS, the changes in some EEC were maintained and, in some cases, were greater than during APS treatment. This data provides evidence of microbiota influences on regulating EEC networks in different regions of the GIT, with a single microbe, Bt, recapitulating its role in a process that may be dependent upon its fermentation products.

Microbes Affect Gut Epithelial Cell Composition Through Immune-Dependent Regulation of Intestinal Stem Cell Differentiation.

Host-Microbe Interactions Regulate Intestinal Stem Cells and Tissue Turnover in Drosophila

Host-microbiota interaction in intestinal stem cell homeostasis

Microbiota promote secretory cell determination in the intestinal epithelium by modulating host Notch signaling

A single cell survey of the microbial impacts on the mouse small intestinal epithelium

Gut microbiota modulating intestinal stem cell differentiation

Gut Microbiota‐stem Cell Niche Crosstalk: A New Territory for Maintaining Intestinal Homeostasis

The role of Drosophila microbiota in gut homeostasis and immunity

A Special Network Comprised of Macrophages, Epithelial Cells, and Gut Microbiota for Gut Homeostasis

Gut microbiota: sculptors of the intestinal stem cell niche in health and inflammatory bowel disease

Regulation of Enteroendocrine Cell Networks by the Major Human Gut Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron

The role of intestinal stem cell within gut homeostasis: Focusing on its interplay with gut microbiota and the regulating pathways

Transcriptional Integration of Distinct Microbial and Nutritional Signals by the Small Intestinal Epithelium

Gut Microbiota Promotes Stem Cell Differentiation Through Macrophage and Mesenchymal Niches in Early Postnatal Development.

Erythroid differentiation regulator-1 induced by microbiota in early life drives intestinal stem cell proliferation and regeneration

Microbial Regulation of Enteric Eosinophils and Its Impact on Tissue Remodeling and Th2 Immunity

Gut bacterial metabolites modulate endoplasmic reticulum stress

Epithelial regulation of microbiota-immune cell dynamics

Host innate and adaptive immunity shapes the gut microbiota biogeography

Interaction Between Microbes and Host Intestinal Health: Modulation by Dietary Nutrients and Gut-Brain-Endocrine-Immune Axis

Epithelial sensing of microbiota-derived signals