Abstract:In evaluating prediction markets (and other crowd-prediction mechanisms), investigators have repeatedly observed a so-called "wisdom of crowds" effect, which roughly says that the average of participants performs much better than the average participant. The market price---an average or at least aggregate of traders' beliefs---offers a better estimate than most any individual trader's opinion. In this paper, we ask a stronger question: how does the market price compare to the best trader's belief, not just the average trader. We measure the market's worst-case log regret, a notion common in machine learning theory. To arrive at a meaningful answer, we need to assume something about how traders behave. We suppose that every trader optimizes according to the Kelly criteria, a strategy that provably maximizes the compound growth of wealth over an (infinite) sequence of market interactions. We show several consequences. First, the market prediction is a wealth-weighted average of the individual participants' beliefs. Second, the market learns at the optimal rate, the market price reacts exactly as if updating according to Bayes' Law, and the market prediction has low worst-case log regret to the best individual participant. We simulate a sequence of markets where an underlying true probability exists, showing that the market converges to the true objective frequency as if updating a Beta distribution, as the theory predicts. If agents adopt a fractional Kelly criteria, a common practical variant, we show that agents behave like full-Kelly agents with beliefs weighted between their own and the market's, and that the market price converges to a time-discounted frequency. Our analysis provides a new justification for fractional Kelly betting, a strategy widely used in practice for ad-hoc reasons. Finally, we propose a method for an agent to learn her own optimal Kelly fraction.

Implications of Belief Distribution and Loss Aversion for Betting Market Anomalies

A Strategic Asset Pricing Model for Relative Performance Concern

Myopic Loss Aversion or Equate-to-differentiate Heuristic? A Heuristic Decision Making Model for Both Single and Aggregated Plays.

Prospect Theory and Stock Market Anomalies

Lottery-Related Anomalies: the Role of Reference-Dependent Preferences

Online Learning in Betting Markets: Profit versus Prediction

Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Relative Performance

The Longshot Bias Is a Context Effect

Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices

SELLING TO BIASED BELIEVERS: STRATEGIES OF ONLINE LOTTERY TICKET VENDORS

Representativeness Biases and Lucky Store Effects

Learning Performance of Prediction Markets with Kelly Bettors

Gambling on Momentum

Asset pricing for the lottery-like security under probability weighting: Based on generalized Wang transform

The Efficient Tail Hypothesis: An Extreme Value Perspective on Market Efficiency

Heterogeneous beliefs with preference interdependence and asset pricing

Heterogeneous Prior Beliefs and Asset Pricing with Expected Gain from Active Trading

Belief Uncertainty, Volatility Risk Premium, and Speculative Trading

Despite Absolute Information Advantages, All Investors Incur Welfare Loss

Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis

A Model of Anomaly Discovery