Abstract:ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to observe the safety and efficacy of electrophysiological mapping following the Cox-Maze IV procedure and to investigate whether a correlation exists between recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) with the completeness of bidirectional electrical isolation and the inducibility of AF immediately after the Cox-Maze IV procedure. MethodsTotally, 80 consecutive patients who suffered from aortic valve or mitral valve disease and persistent AF were randomly enrolled into the control group and electrophysiological mapping following the Cox-Maze IV group (Electrophysio-Maze group). In the Electrophysio-Maze group, patients underwent concomitant Cox-Maze procedure and following electrophysiological mapping of ablation lines in mitral isthmus, left atrial "box," and tricuspid annulus. If the bidirectional electrical isolation of tricuspid annulus ablation line is incomplete, whether to implement supplementary ablation will be independently decided by the operator. Before and after the Cox-Maze IV procedure, AF induction was performed. All patients in both groups were continuously followed-up and underwent electrocardiogram Holter monitoring after 6 months. ResultsIn total, 42 Electrophysio-Maze patients and 38 controls were enrolled. Compared with patients in the control group, there were shorter hospital stay, better cardiac remodeling changes, and higher relief from AF during the follow-up period of 6 months in the Electrophysio-Maze group. Within the Electrophysio-Maze group, the rate of incomplete the bidirectional electrical isolation of "box" ablation lines was zero, and the rate of incomplete bidirectional electrical isolation of mitral isthmus ablation line or tricuspid annulus ablation line was 23.8%. After two cases of successful complementary ablation on the tricuspid annulus ablation line, the final incomplete bidirectional electrical isolation of annulus ablation lines was 19.0%. There were correlations between late AF recurrence after 6 months with incomplete bidirectional electrical isolation of annulus ablation lines and AF induction immediately after the Cox-Maze IV procedure. ConclusionElectrophysiological mapping following the Cox-Maze procedure is safe and effective. Electrophysiological mapping in the Cox-Maze procedure can find out the non-transmural annulus ablation lines by assessing the completeness of bidirectional electrical isolation of ablation lines, guide supplementary ablation, and predict AF recurrence after 6 months.

Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery in Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-center Experience in China

Potential Maintenance Mechanism in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Subject to Different Treatment Procedures: A Preliminary Study Based on a Human Atrial Model

Case Report: the Cox-Maze IV Procedure in the Mirror: the Use of Three-Dimensional Printing for Pre-operative Planning in a Patient with Situs Inversus Dextrocardia

Minimally invasive Cox Maze Ⅳ ablation procedure performed entirely by bipolar clamp concomitant to mitral valve surgery through right lateral minithoracotomy

Efficacy of Catheter Ablation and Surgical CryoMaze Procedure in Patients with Long-Lasting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Rheumatic Heart Disease: a Randomized Trial

Effect of electrophysiological mapping on non-transmural annulus ablation and atrial fibrillation recurrence prediction after 6 months of Cox-Maze IV procedure

Intraoperative Saline-irrigated Radiofrequency Modified Maze Procedure for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation in Mitral Valve Diseases

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Plus Low-Voltage Area Modification in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Prospective randomized comparison between upgraded ‘2C3L’ vs. PVI approach for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: PROMPT-AF trial design

Long-term Outcomes of Maze Procedure Plus Valve Replacement in Treating Rheumatic Valve Disease Resulting in Atrial Fibrillation.

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Rheumatic Valvular Disease

Outcome of Cox Maze Procedure Concomitant with Mitral Valve Operation in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

The Effect of Different Ablation Lines in Left Atrium on Modified Cardiac Cox Maze Procedure

Effectiveness of Maze IV procedure versus thoracoscopic ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis

Machine learning-based analysis of risk factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence after Cox-Maze IV procedure in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic valvular disease: A retrospective cohort study with a control group

Application of Cut-and-Sew Technique in Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery and Concomitant Maze Procedure

The Cox-Maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease

Right Minithoracotomy Versus Conventional Median Sternotomy for Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery and Cox-maze IV Ablation with Entirely Bipolar Radiofrequency Clamp

The therapeutic effects of modified Cox-Maze Ⅲ procedure using bipolar radiofrequency ablation for rheumatic valve disease combined with permanent atrial fibrillation

Long-term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Modified Cox maze surgery for chronic atrial fibrillation with rheumatic valvular disease