Project Control Through Disincentivisation: A Case Study of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge Project

Liuying Zhu,Sai On Cheung,Xinglin Gao,Qian Li,Gang Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_93
2020-01-01
Abstract:Incentives and disincentives (I/D hereafter) arrangements have been regularly used as project control measures. Incentives aim to enhance performance through reward provisions, whereas disincentives penalise performance below agreed targets. Use of incentives are based on motivation theories and has been well recognized as a catalyst for performance. Disincentives are relatively less studied even though it is also commonly used to deter underperformance. Compared with incentives, disincentives are less costly and can function well when the monetary reward is not the sole performance motivator. This proposition is discussed and illustrated through a case study on the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge (HZMB) project. In the HZMB project, disincentivisation was integrated with the Reputation Evaluation System (the System hereafter). The System has four parts: (1) Goal Commitment; (2) Reward/Responsibility reallocation; (3) Monitoring method application and (4) Performance Assessment. Through focus group discussions, it is found that (1) The System is a useful project control tool; (2) The desire to maintain reputation underpins the effectiveness of The System; and (3) The System is instrumental in relationship building. Disincentivisation is effective in the HZMB when it is linked with the performance status of the contracting organizations. The importance of maintaining a reputation in signature projects like the HZMB makes disincnetivisation a less costly and viable project control measure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?