Maintained P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor monotherapy after shorter-duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stents implantation: An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials

Zhong-guo Fan,Nai-Liang Tian,Sheng-Hu He,Gen-Shan Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13626
2022-01-01
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Abstract:What is known and Objective It is well known that high in-stent thrombotic risk due to the superimposition of a platelet-rich thrombus was considered as the main origin of major adverse cardiac events after stent implantation. The clinical management of antiplatelet therapy strategy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. This study is sought to explore the efficacy and safety of a maintained P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy after shorter-duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in these patients. Methods Medline, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry were searched online for retrieving eligible citations. A composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke was defined as major adverse cardio- and cerebro-vascular events (MACCE), which is analysed as the primary efficacy endpoint. The risk of bleeding events was chosen as safety endpoint. Results Five randomized clinical trials (RCT) with 32,143 patients were finally analysed. A maintained P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy after shorter-duration of DAPT cloud not only reduce the incidence of MACCE [odds ratios (OR): 0.89, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.79-0.99, p = 0.037], but also the bleeding risk (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.85, p = 0.003). No higher incidence of any ischaemic events, including MI, stroke or definite stent thrombosis (ST) was observed with respect to this new antiplatelet therapy option. Conclusions A maintained P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy after shorter-duration of DAPT was suggested as a more preferable antiplatelet therapy option in patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) placement. Larger and more powerful randomized trials with precise sub-analyses are still necessary for further confirming these relevant benefits.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?