Carboniferous Conodont Biostratigraphy

James E. Barrick,Alexander S. Alekseev,Silvia Blanco-Ferrera,Natalia V. Goreva,Keyi Hu,Lance L. Lambert,Tamara I. Nemyrovska,Yuping Qi,Scott M. Ritter,Javier Sanz-López
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/sp512-2020-38
2021-01-01
Abstract:AbstractCarboniferous conodont biostratigraphy comprises regional zonations that reflect the palaeogeographical distribution of taxa and distinct shallow-water and deep-water conodont biofacies. Some species have a global distribution and can effect high quality correlations. These taxa are incorporated into definitions of global Carboniferous chronostratigraphic units. A standard global Carboniferous zonation has not been developed. The lowermost Mississippian is zoned bySiphonodellaspecies, excepet in shallow-water facies, where other polygnathids are used.Gnathodusspecies radiated during the Tournaisian and are used to define many Mississippian zones. A late Tournaisian maximum in diversity, characterized by short-lived genera, was followed by lower diversity faunas ofGnathodusspecies and carminate genera through the Visean and Serpukhovian. By the late Visean and Serpukhovian,Lochrieaprovides better biostratigraphic resolution. Shallow-water zonations based onCavusgnathusandMestognathusare difficult to correlate. An extinction event near the base of the Pennsylvanian was followed by the appearance of new gnathodid genera:Rhachistognathus,Declinognathodus,Neognathodus,IdiognathoidesandIdiognathodus. By the middle of the Moscovian, few genera remained:Idiognathodus,NeognathodusandSwadelina.During the middle Kasimovian and Gzhelian, onlyIdiognathodusandStreptognathodusspecies were common. Near the end of the Gzhelian, a rediversification ofStreptognathodusspecies extended into the Cisuralian.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?