Abstract:Research Summary By integrating performance feedback theory and ownership management literature, we examine how parent multinational companies (MNCs) evaluate their foreign subsidiaries' poor performance against various aspirations and make multifaceted ownership change decisions. Our results show that social aspirations matter more than historical aspirations in ownership change decisions. When a focal subsidiary is underperforming relative to industry peers or overseas subsidiary peers, its parent MNC tends to change its ownership of foreign subsidiaries and by a high degree. However, regarding the direction of ownership change, a foreign subsidiary with performance below industry peers tends to experience an ownership decrease, whereas the opposite is true when a subsidiary's performance is below overseas subsidiary peers. Overall, we extend existing theories that downplay the role of aspirations in ownership changes. Managerial Summary Effective ownership management in foreign subsidiaries is key to sustaining the global operations of MNCs. An important task for parent managers is to make sense of the poor performance of their foreign subsidiaries against various aspirations and respond in terms of ownership change decisions. We find that managers are more sensitive when their foreign subsidiary's performance is below its social peers than below its past performance. Specifically, parent managers tend to change ownership to a large extent when their foreign subsidiary is poorly performed compared with its industry peers as an external benchmark or overseas subsidiary peers as an internal benchmark. Moreover, parent managers tend to reduce ownership when the subsidiary's performance is below industry peers, while are more likely to increase ownership when the performance is below its overseas subsidiary peers.

Controlling Developed-Country Subsidiaries Via Human Resource Management

Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationship and Foreign Subsidiary Innovation in Emerging Multinationals: A Loose Coupling Perspective

Does Control-Ownership Divergence Impair Market Liquidity in an Emerging Market? Evidence from China

Driving Forces And Organisational Configurations Of International R&D: The Case Of Technology-Intensive Chinese Multinationals

The Multifaceted Ownership Change of Foreign Subsidiaries: the Diverse Responses to Different Types of Negative Performance Feedback

Control in Multinational Corporations (MNCs): The Case of Korean Manufacturing Subsidiaries

Managing Dependency In China Outsourcing Relationships

FDI Legitimacy and MNC Subsidiary Control: From Legitimation to Competition

Effect of Supervisor–subordinate Guanxi on Supervisory Decisions in China: an Empirical Investigation

Dragons in the West: Localization Strategies of Chinese MNCs in Developed Economies

MNCs as dispersed structures of power: Performance and management implications of power distribution in the subsidiary portfolio

The Impact of Formal Control and Guanxi on Task Conflict in Outsourcing Relationships in China

Cultural distance and subsidiary roles in knowledge transfer in MNCs in China

How do emerging multinationals achieve sustainable development globally? The enabling mechanism of headquarter‐subsidiary structure in subsidiary sustainability

Human resource management and industrial relations in multinational corporations in and from China: Challenges and new insights

Human resource management in Chinese multinationals in the United Kingdom: The interplay of institutions, culture, and strategic choice

From foreign investors to strategic insiders: Shifting parameters, prescriptions and paradigms for MNCs in China

Control Modes and Outcomes of Transformed State-Owned Enterprises in China: An Empirical Test

Corporate Governance of Controlling Shareholders and Labor Employment Decisions: Evidence from a Parent Board Reform in China

Corporate ownership, equity risk and returns in the People's Republic of China

Subsidiary staffing strategy and innovation performance in Chinese multinational enterprises: the moderating effect of institutional distance