Antecedents of Responsible Ambidexterity of Research and Innovation: an Agency Perspective

Liang Mei,Nana Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.13833abstract
2020-01-01
Abstract:The potential conflict of diverse responsible principles of science and technology (S&T) and multi-stakeholders’ value assessment make research and innovation (R&I) regarded as responsible comprehensively as well as exclusively. The study adopts two constructs – “responsible comprehensiveness” and “responsible appropriability” of S&T – to illustrate the responsible ambidexterity of R&I, and explores the relevant antecedents from an agency perspective. Upon 19707 individual-level poll data, it explores the relationship of three typologies of agency (involving iterational agency, strategic agency, ethical agency) on the responsible comprehensiveness and responsible appropriability of S&T. Results entail positive relationship between iterational agency and responsible appropriability, and between strategic agency and responsible comprehensiveness; And U-shaped effects of iterational agency on responsible comprehensiveness, strategic agency on responsible appropriability, and ethical agency on both responsible comprehensiveness and responsible appropriability of S&T. Moreover, ethical agency is found to be more important for the responsible appropriability rather than the responsible comprehensiveness of S&T.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?