Formation, isomerization, and dissociation of tyrosine-containing tripeptide radical cations

Shuoqi Sun,Heyuan Jia,Jie Cao,Shifang Lu,Shilv Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/ssc-2020-0080
2020-01-01
Scientia Sinica Chimica
Abstract:Two series of tripeptide radical cations ([AYG]·+, [AYG·]+; [GYG]·+, [G·YG]+ and [GYG·]+) were successfully prepared via multistage collision-induced dissociation (CID) of a ternary complex of copper-ligand-tripeptide [Cu(L)Peptide]2+ (L=4′-chloro-2,2′:6′,2′′terpyridine (4Cl-tpy); Peptide=alanyl-tyrosyl-glycine (AYG) or glycyl-tyrosyl-glycine (GYG) tripeptide). The gas-phase isomerization and dissociation mechanism of isomeric AYG radical ions, and the different dissociation behaviors between AYG and GYG radical ions, have been obtained by observing their gas-phase dissociation reactions combined with density functional theory (DFT) calculation. Studies have revealed that: (1) [AYG·]+ and [AYG]·+ produced almost identical CID spectra (their main product ions are [x2+H]·+ ions), suggesting that interconversion occurs prior to dissociation. (2) The dissociation paths of [A·YG]+ and [G·YG]+ are the same (both of which produces [b2−H]·+ fragment ions by cleavage of amide C−N bond, indicating that [A·YG]+ cannot isomerize to [AYG·]+ and [AYG]·+. DFT calculation gives the gas-phase stability order of these three peptide radical ions ([A·YG]+>[AYG·]+>[AYG]·+) and their isomerization/dissociation energy barriers. Isomerization energy barrier (47.4 kcal/mol) of [AYG·]+® [AYG]·+ is lower than dissociation energy barrier (72.7 kcal/mol) of [AYG·]+, but higher than that (44.3 kcal/mol) of [AYG]·+, thereby the gas-phase dissociation mechanism of [AYG·]+ undergoes a two-step reaction: the first step is the isomerization process of [AYG·]+®[AYG]·+, and the second step is the dissociation reaction of [AYG]·+®[x2+H]·+, which produces [x2+H]·+ fragment ions by cleavage of N-terminal Cα−C bond in [AYG]·+. (4) The gas-phase dissociation characteristics of [GYG]·+ and [AYG]·+ are dramatically different. [GYG]·+ mainly produces [z2−H]·+ by cleavage of the second N−Cα bond (counting from the N-terminal amino acid residue).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?