Abstract:The civil service examination system emerged to strengthen the emperor's power by recruiting political elites through open examinations. Did it, during the early- and mid-Ming dynasty, facilitate intergenerational mobility? Rather than oversimplifying it as a single-stage system of meritocracy, we propose a two-stage evaluation framework. In the first stage, the Metropolitan Exam featured merit-based evaluations and generated credentials necessary for becoming political elites. The subsequent non-eliminating Palace Exam then functioned to assess the students' organizational fit in line with an emperor's political calculations. In particular, those whose families served in the bureaucracy were favored, while those from affluent families were discriminated against. We test this two-stage framework using the records of 12,427 students who passed 46 exams between 1400 and 1580, a period characterizing the heyday of this system. Our empirical findings from the mixed-effect regression models confirm this argument and suggest promising directions for future research. Le systeme d'examen de la fonction publique est apparu pour renforcer le pouvoir de l'empereur en recrutant des elites politiques par le biais d'examens ouverts. A-t-il, au debut et au milieu de la dynastie Ming, facilite la mobilite intergenerationnelle ? Plutot que de le simplifier a l'extreme comme un systeme de meritocratie a une seule etape, nous proposons un cadre d'evaluation en deux etapes. Au premier stade, l'examen metropolitain comportait une evaluation fondee sur le merite et permettait d'obtenir les qualifications necessaires pour devenir des elites politiques. L'examen du palais, non eliminatoire, permettait ensuite d'evaluer l'aptitude organisationnelle des etudiants en fonction des calculs politiques de l'empereur. En particulier, ceux dont les familles travaillaient dans la bureaucratie etaient favorises, tandis que ceux issus de familles aisees etaient discrimines. Nous testons ce cadre en deux etapes en utilisant les dossiers de 12 427 etudiants qui ont passe 46 examens entre 1400 et 1580, une periode qui caracterise l'apogee de ce systeme. Les resultats empiriques de nos modeles de regression a effets mixtes confirment cet argument et suggerent des directions prometteuses pour la recherche future.

Education and the Meritocratic Recruitment of Bureaucrats

The Human Capital Effects of Access to Elite Jobs

Networks and Meritocracy in Elite Recruitment: The Chinese Civil Service Examinations, 1400-1580

The Institution of Merit: A Study of Chinese College Admissions

Meritocracy and Its Discontents: Long-run Effects of Repeated School Admission Reforms

The Causal Effect of Social Networks on Elite Recruitment

Meritocracy and the Making of the Chinese Academe Redux, 1912–1952

The Illusion of Merit in Political Leadership Selection in China

Meritocracy and the Making of the Chinese Academe, 1912-1952

The Allocation of Talent and Financial Development, 1897 to 1936

My Superior’s Appreciation, My Subordinates’ Promotion: Experimental Evidence of a Promotion Decision Model of Middle-Level Bureaucrats in China

Time is Power: Rethinking Meritocratic Political Selection in China

Community Contexts, Socioeconomic Status, and Meritocratic Beliefs and Perceptions in China

Merit-Based Patronage: Career Incentives of Local Leading Cadres in China

Are Opportunities to Equalize Elite High Schools Discriminatory? Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Design

Intergenerational mobility through inhabited meritocracy: Evidence from civil service examinations of the early- and mid-Ming dynasty

Higher Education Admission Policy and Social Class of Ethnic Minority: The Case of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Elite Education , Wage Premium , and Social Mobility : The Truth and Illusion of China ’ s College Entrance Exam ∗

Access to Elite Education , Wage Premium , and Social Mobility : Evidence from China ’ S College Entrance Exam