Paying Extra for a Label? Evidence of Principal-Agent Problem in the Housing Market

Keyang Li,Jing Wu,Jianwei Xing,Jubo Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3570588
2020-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Intermediaries play an important role in the markets with asymmetric information by reducing the search friction and uncertainty for buyers and sellers. However, when conflict of interest arises, agents may not fully act on behalf of their clients. Using a unique data set of housing resale transactions and agent showing records from a major brokerage firm in China, we document brokerage agents’ steering behaviors induced by the “full 5& only” taxation scheme, and quantify the consequences of such steering on market outcomes in the housing market. Our results show that real estate agents do not always help consumers reduce information asymmetry but instead strategically promote the units that are attached with the “full 5& only” labels, as they offer higher expected commissions. The steering efforts lead to better sales performances of the labelled houses and are highly correlated with agent’s experience, ability and steering incentives. The buyers thus bear the welfare consequences from potential mismatch and the additional cost in acquiring the labelled units.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?