Abstract 1505: Unraveling diepafitaxis: Investigating ECM stiffness and microarchitecture in tumor spheroid migration
Hsiang-Pei Chen,Ya-Chu Tsai,Ting-Yuan Tu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-1505
IF: 11.2
2024-03-22
Cancer Research
Abstract:Abstract Background: Metastasis, accounting for up to 90% of cancer-related deaths, remains one of the least understood aspects of cancer progression. Recent research has shifted focus from solely biological hallmarks to the physical characteristics of cancer, such as the stiffness and microarchitecture of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which play pivotal roles in metastatic advancement. We previously introduced the concept of 'diepafitaxis' to describe a unique mechanism driving the interface-mediated tropism of tumor spheroids at matrix-surface boundaries. This phenomenon suggests that cancer cells preferentially migrate along a 2D 'interfacial' track formed by heterogeneous 3D ECM structures, facilitating invasion and dispersion. However, the exact mechanisms by which interfacial components, stiffness, and structural attributes influence cell movement remain debated. To investigate this, we have developed a microfluidic chip with a precisely controlled stiffness of the hydrogel matrix-matrix interface (MMI), aiming to shed light on specific diepafitatic behaviors. Method: We developed a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based microfluidic chip using a traditional photolithographic process. This chip features three channels, with the center channel designed to precisely control various MMI stiffness combinations: stiff vs soft (t-o), stiff vs stiff (t-t) and soft vs soft (o-o). MDA-MB-231 breast cancer spheroids (BCS), representing an in vitro tumor model, were embedded in the top gel. We observed the dynamic behavior of these cancer spheroids over a 24-h period using differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. Result: The study revealed that BCS exhibited more pronounced dispersion in a soft homogeneous ECM compared to a stiff ECM in 3D environments. Interestingly, when BCS were near an MMI, a stiffer MMI (t-t) significantly enhanced BCS invasiveness and single-cell migration, more so than t-o, and notably more than o-o. We previously described this phenomenon as '2.5D migration,' where cells migrate in a ventral 2D manner within a sandwiched 3D gel structure. This diepafitatic behavior was further analyzed for its response to gravitational effects and the influence of chemotaxis, induced by introducing VEGF on one side of the microfluidic channel. Conclusion: Conclusively, our study demonstrates that the stiffness and structure of the ECM, particularly at MMI, significantly influence the invasive behavior and migration patterns of BCS, underscoring the critical role of mechanical microenvironments in cancer metastasis. Citation Format: Hsiang-Pei Chen, Ya-Chu Tsai, Ting-Yuan Tu. Unraveling diepafitaxis: Investigating ECM stiffness and microarchitecture in tumor spheroid migration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1505.
oncology