Airplane Pilot Performance in a Flight Simulator Under Varying Carbon Dioxide Concentrations

Xiaodong Cao,Piers MacNaughton,Jose Guillermo Cedeno-Laurent,Skye Flanigan,Jose Vallarino,Deborah Donnelly-McLay,Joseph G. Allen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isesisee.2018.p03.1230

2018-01-01

ISEE Conference Abstracts

Abstract:Recent studies suggest that carbon dioxide has an impact on cognitive functions of office workers at concentrations in the range of 1000-2500 ppm. Reports of CO2 concentrations on airplanes are in the same range, so we were motivated to test the impact of CO2 on airplane pilot performance. In this study, we recruited 30 active commercial airline pilots to fly three 3-hour flight segments in an FAA-approved flight simulator under three different CO2 concentrations (700, 1500, 2500 ppm), each time blinded to test conditions and with the order of exposures randomized. CO2 concentrations were directly modified by introducing ultra-pure CO2 into the simulator with the ventilation rate unchanged. The pilots performed a series of pre-defined maneuvers of varying difficulty without the aid of autopilot and were assessed by an FAA Designated Pilot Examiner according to FAA Practical Test Standards. The results showed that airplane pilots performed better at lower CO2 concentrations on the flight deck. Compared to segments at a CO2 concentration of 2500 ppm, the odds of passing a maneuver as rated by the Examiner in the simulator were 1.52 (95% CI: 1.02 – 2.25) times higher when pilots were exposed to 1500 ppm and 1.69 (95% CI: 1.11 – 2.55) times higher when exposed to 700 ppm, controlling for maneuver difficulty, Examiner and order of maneuvers. The effect of CO2 on passing rates became more pronounced the longer the pilots were in the simulator. These findings suggest that there is a direct effect of carbon dioxide on cognitive performance, independent of ventilation, with implications for many other indoor environments that routinely experience CO2 concentrations above 1000 ppm.