Short and Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Semen Quality in Taiwan

Xiang Qian Lao,Zilong Zhang,Alexis KH Lau,Ta-Chien Chan,Yuan Chieh Chuang,Jimmy Chan,Changqing Lin,Cui Guo,Wun Kai Jiang,Tony Tam,Gerard Hoek,Haidong Kan,Eng-kiong Yeoh,Ly-yun Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2017.2017-317
2018-01-01
ISEE Conference Abstracts
Abstract:Background/Aim: Environmental exposure to chemicals has been considered as a potential factor contributing to deteriorated semen quality. However, there is limited information on exposure to air pollution and semen quality. We therefore investigated the health effects of short- and long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on semen quality in a large Taiwanese population. Methods: We studied 6,475 male participants aged 15-49 years who participated in a standard medical examination program in Taiwan between 2001 and 2014. Semen quality measurements included sperm concentration, total motility, progressive motility and morphology. We estimated PM2.5 exposure at each participant`s residential address using a spatio-temporal model based on satellite-derived aerosol optical depth data. A spermatogenic cycle average concentration (based on the concentrations of the month of the semen examination and the two months before the examination) was used as an indicator of short-term exposure. A 2-year average concentration (based on the concentrations of the year of the semen exanimation and the year before the exanimation) was used as an indicator of long-term exposure. Multivariable linear regression models were used to investigate the associations between PM2.5 and semen parameters. Results: The 3-month and the 2-year PM2.5 concentration were highly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0.81, P < 0.001). An increment of 5 μg/m3 in PM2.5 was associated with a decrease in normal morphology (0.83% for short-term exposure and 1.29% for long-term exposure). In contrast, an increment of 5 μg/m3 in PM2.5 was associated with an increase in sperm concentration (1.02 × 106/ml for short-term exposure or 1.03 × 106/ml for long-term exposure) and total motility (0.20% for short-term exposure or 0.34% for long-term exposure). Conclusions: Long-term exposure to PM2.5 air pollution decreases the percentage of sperm with normal morphology. We speculate the positive associations between PM2.5 and sperm concentrations/motility may due to the compensation mechanism.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?