P1‐399: SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF APOE Ε4 AND WORRY ON CORTICAL MORPHOLOGY IN SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE DECLINE

Yu Sun,Xinian Zuo,Ying Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.1004
2019-01-01
Abstract:Subjective cognitive decline (SCD), referred as individuals with self-reported persistent decline in memory, is common in cognitively normal elders. Additional features of SCD like (1) worry or concern related to SCD and (2) presence of APOE ε4 allele were associated with increasing predictive value of SCD for AD progression (Snitz et al. 2018). However, the brain structural alterations underlying the phenotype (worry) and genotype (APOE ε4) risk factors in SCD population remain unclear. Here, we investigate whether APOE ε4 statue and worry feeling will influence brain morphology in SCD. A total of 136 cognitively normal older individuals with SCD from XuanWu hospital were included in this study. The question “Are you worried about the problem(s) with remembering?” was used to separate the SCD subjects into worry group (n=88) and non-worry group (n=48). T1-weighted images were preprocessed by Connectome Computation System (Xu et al. 2015). Briefly, the whole workflow included spatially adaption, inhomogeneity correction, intensity normalization, gray matter/white matter segmentation, and surface reconstruction, which were implemented in volBrain pipeline (Manjon et al. 2016) and the “recon-all” command in FreeSurfer. The entire procedure mapped brain morphometric measures of total cortical volume (mm3), and bilateral cortical surface area (mm2). A two-way ANCOVA was performed to examine the interaction effect with worry and APOE ε4 on these morphometric measures. The results revealed that significant main effect of phenotype (worry) and significant phenotype-by-genotype (APOE ε4) interactions on total cortical volume (P=0.001) and bilateral surface area (RH: P=0.001; LH: P=0.003) in SCD. Post hoc comparisons showed that SCD with worry had significantly decreased cortical volume and surface area compared to no-worry SCD in APOE ε4 carriers (P=0.001). While in ε4 non-carriers, there was no significant differences between groups (P=0.398) (Fig.A). Intriguingly, we further observed reduced cortical volume and surface area in ε4 carriers than non-carriers in worry SCD, while increased volume and area in ε4 carriers than non-carriers in no-worry SCD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?