Abstract:In this work, we evaluate different algorithms to account for model errors while estimating the model parameters, especially when the model discrepancy (used interchangeably with "model error") is large. In addition, we introduce two new algorithms that are closely related to some of the published approaches under consideration. Considering all these algorithms, the first calibration approach (base case scenario) relies on Bayesian inversion using iterative ensemble smoothing with annealing schedules without any special treatment for the model error. In the second approach, the residual obtained after calibration is used to iteratively update the total error covariance combining the effects of both model errors and measurement errors. In the third approach, the principal component analysis (PCA)-based error model is used to represent the model discrepancy during history matching. This leads to a joint inverse problem in which both the model parameters and the parameters of a PCA-based error model are estimated. For the joint inversion within the Bayesian framework, prior distributions have to be defined for all the estimated parameters, and the prior distribution for the PCA-based error model parameters are generally hard to define. In this study, the prior statistics of the model discrepancy parameters are estimated using the outputs from pairs of high-fidelity and low-fidelity models generated from the prior realizations. The fourth approach is similar to the third approach; however, an additional covariance matrix of difference between a PCA-based error model and the corresponding actual realizations of prior error is added to the covariance matrix of the measurement error. The first newly introduced algorithm (fifth approach) relies on building an orthonormal basis for the misfit component of the error model, which is obtained from a difference between the PCA-based error model and the corresponding actual realizations of the prior error. The misfit component of the error model is subtracted from the data residual (difference between observations and model outputs) to eliminate the incorrect relative contribution to the prediction from the physical model and the error model. In the second newly introduced algorithm (sixth approach), we use the PCA-based error model as a physically motivated bias correction term and an iterative update of the covariance matrix of the total error during history matching. All the algorithms are evaluated using three forecasting measures, and the results show that a good parameterization of the error model is needed to obtain a good estimate of physical model parameters and to provide better predictions. In this study, the last three approaches (i.e., fourth, fifth, sixth) outperform the other methods in terms of the quality of estimated model parameters and the prediction capability of the calibrated imperfect models.

Identifiability of Model Discrepancy Parameters in History Matching

Robust Algorithms for History Matching of Imperfect Subsurface Models

Efficient History Matching Using the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo Method by Means of the Transformed Adaptive Stochastic Collocation Method

Some notes on MPC relevant identification

Multilevel Strategies and Geological Parameterizations for History Matching Complex Reservoir Models

A History Matching Approach for Calibrating Hydrological Models

Improved Estimation and Forecasting Through Residual-Based Model Error Quantification

Recent Progress on Reservoir History Matching: A Review

The regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme for history matching of petroleum reservoirs,

Discrepancy Modeling Framework: Learning Missing Physics, Modeling Systematic Residuals, and Disambiguating between Deterministic and Random Effects

Improved Estimation and Forecast Through Model Error Estimation – Norne Field Example

History matching with probabilistic emulators and active learning

On Uncertainty Quantification of History Matched Facies Models

Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy

Data Driven Model Mismatch Detection Based on Statistical Band of Markov Parameters

History Matching with Learned Sparse Dictionaries

Parametric Mismatch Detection and Isolation in Model Predictive Control System

Flexible Iterative Ensemble Smoother for Calibration of Perfect and Imperfect Models

History Matching Complex 3D Systems Using Deep-Learning-Based Surrogate Flow Modeling and CNN-PCA Geological Parameterization

Model plant mismatch detection algorithm based on subspace approach

SPSA Algorithm for Matching of Historical Data for Complex Non-Gaussian Geological Models