Abstract:AbstractWe examine the performance of nearly 2000 actively managed equity funds using attribution analysis, a process commonly used by mutual funds to isolate management contributions from the sector allocation and stock selection components of fund returns. For the period 1994 through 2005 we show that, on average, potential gains from sector allocation were offset by poor stock selection. However, equity managers excelled at sector allocation and stock selection during the bear market of 2000-2002. Over the 12-year sample period, returns from actively managed funds dominated returns from passive portfolios with less risk, primarily because of their performance during the bear market.© 2012 Academy of Financial Services. All rights reserved.JEL classification: G11; G2Keywords: Managed mutual funds; Attribution performance1. IntroductionManagers of actively managed funds require sound and reliable performance measurement to evaluate and guide their investment decisions. Performance evaluations reveal how managers are performing relative to their competition, how they should be rewarded, and whether changes in strategy are required. Sound and reliable evaluation also provides individual investors with information necessary to guide their financial planning.Performance typically uses variations on the Sharpe (1966) index and alphas derived from either the single-index market model or multifactor models. However, performance attribution or attribution analysis, which is widely used in the fund industry for compensation purposes, differs from widely studied performance models in that it uses a fund-specific benchmark, or bogey, to evaluate fund performance. Based on the fund's bogey, the equity fund can precisely determine how their managers' sector allocation and security selection decisions each contribute to the fund's total return.1 While fund managers are commonly judged on their performance relative to an index such as the SP while factor derived alphas are not. Why? Because attribution analysis differs from factor-based models by providing estimates of both sector allocation and stock selection components of a fund's return regardless of the fund's objective or investment strategy. Accurately tracking both components enables active fund managers with a variety of investment objectives to effectively monitor them, and to make appropriate changes as information arrives. Importantly, if data services provided performance data based on attribution analysis, investors could more effectively monitor management's potential by observing their ability to generate wealth from each attribute.Recent research challenges the assumption that betas derived from historical data represent investor risk. Fama and French (2007) report that their size (SMB) and value (HML) factors contain excess positive returns resulting from unanticipated higher growth in U.S. business productivity over the last century. This growth represents exploitable opportunities in sector allocation and stock selection for fund managers who are able to anticipate forthcoming productivity gains. Additionally, Moskowitz and Grinblatt (1999) conclude that astute investors can capture the Carhart (1997) momentum factor premiums (PYR) of Jegadeesh and Titman (1993). The same explanation applies for the single-factor market model, which incorporates the net impact of the three remaining Carhart factors, plus any unobserved priced factors representing productivity gains or losses because of changes in expected cash flows and/or risk. …

Revealed Preferences of Mutual Fund Investors in Good and Bad Times

A Strategic Asset Pricing Model for Relative Performance Concern

Does Prospect Theory Explain Mutual Fund Performance? Evidence from China

On Market Timing, Stock Picking, and Managerial Skills of Mutual Fund Managers with Manipulation-Proof Performance Measure

Dynamic Market Timing in Mutual Funds

A Reliable Performance Measure to Differentiate China's Actively Managed Open-End Equity Mutual Funds

Exploring the Timing Stock Selection Ability of U.S. Active Index Fund ETF Based on T-M Model

Mutual Fund Performance Attribution: 1994-2005

New Test of Asset Pricing Models in China

Analyzing the Performance of Pakistan Equity Mutual Funds Using Multifactor Models: Pre-COVID Analysis

New Model to Detect Tendency Timing Ability of Mutual Fund Managers

Artificial Market Timing in Mutual Funds

Do funds selected by managers’ skills perform better?

Assessing the Performance and Risk-Adjusted Returns of Financial Mutual Funds

Do Active Funds Perform Better in Down Markets? New Evidence from Cross-Sectional Study

Cashflow Timing vs. Discount-Rate Timing: An Examination of Mutual Fund Market-Timing Skills

Comparative Analysis of Portfolio Management Models: Markowitz, CAPM, and Multi-Factor Models

Out-of-Sample Performance of Mutual Fund Predictors

Investment Decisions Under Ambiguity: Evidence from Mutual Fund Investor Behavior

The Market-Timing Ability of Chinese Equity Securities Investment Funds

Study on Matchability of Risk Preference with Investment Strategy of Open-end Mutual Funds