Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify means of better associating executive remuneration with managerial decision making and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors evaluate the influence of conditional accounting conservatism on CEO compensation. The authors focus particularly on the ex ante pay-for-performance sensitivity (PPS) of CEO stock option grants. The empirical method used is panel data regression. Findings The authors find that accounting conservatism is positively related to the PPS of CEO option-based compensation. The effects of accounting conservatism on the PPS of options are more significant for firms with relatively weaker corporate governance and for the period before the introduction of FAS 123R. The findings suggest that directors reward CEOs for adopting accounting conservatism, both in general terms and incrementally, and that rewards are channelled through incentive-linked compensation. The results are also consistent with the view that accounting conservatism compliments other mechanisms, such as corporate governance, in reducing information asymmetry and agency problems between managers and shareholders and other stakeholders. Originality/value This paper provides a number of important contributions to the literature. It is the first to identify a relationship between accounting conservatism and option-based CEO compensation, which has important potential contracting and enforcement implications due to the incomplete nature of option contracts and the reward and risk attributes of CEOs. This paper is also the first to analyse the association between conditional accounting conservatism and CEO compensation at the firm–year level, by employing the firm–year conservatism score approach proposed by Khan and Watts (2009). This provides for greater insight regarding the interaction between accounting conservatism and other firm-specific elements than is otherwise obtainable from an overall firm or year interpretations derived from the traditional Basu (1997) asymmetric timeliness model approach. Furthermore, this paper also provides a comparison of the relative association of accounting conservatism on both explicit and implicit forms of CEO compensation for the same firm sample. This allows for the assessment of whether accounting conservatism relates differently to incentive-based CEO remuneration relative to ex post CEO compensation outcomes.

Employee Firing Costs and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from Wrongful Discharge Laws

Employment Protection and Banking Power: Evidence from Adoption of Wrongful Discharge Laws

Wage and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from China

Incentives and the Cost of Firing in an Equilibrium Labor Market Model with Endogenous Layoffs*

Managerial risk incentives and accounting conservatism

Accounting Conservatism and Corporate Investment

Employee Turnover Likelihood and Earnings Management: Evidence from the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine

The Effects of Accounting Conservatism on Executive Compensation

Title : Compliance Cost , Corporate Governance and Accounting Conservatism

The Asymmetric Influence of Accounting Conservatism to Earnings Persistenceand Earnings Response Coefficient

Are Accounting Estimate Changes Associated with an Aggressive Earnings Effect? Empirical Evidence

Auditing Tenure and Accounting Conservatism

Corporate Governance and Accounting Conservatism in China

Accounting Conservatism and Protection of Creditors' Interests ——A Research Based on Lawsuits between Banks and Listed Companies

Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings, and Stock Returns

Barriers to Reallocation and Economic Growth: The Effects of Firing Costs

Cognitive Bias,Financial Distress Cost and Financial Conservatism

Accounting Reforms and Conservatism in Earnings: Empirical Evidence from Listed Chinese Companies

Employment protection, corporate governance, and labor productivity around the World

The Effect of Religion on Accounting Conservatism