Institutional Differences in Individual Well-Being in China

Ting Ren,Hongyan Yang,Hui Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2012.17133abstract
2012-01-01
Academy of Management Proceedings
Abstract:Imbalanced distribution of income and welfare characterizes a developing or transitional economy like China. Even after more than thirty-year reform and rapid economic growth, there is still considerable disparity of well-being across different institutional settings in China. Major inequalities exist in the separation of rural and urban areas, public and for-profit sectors, and state-owned and private enterprises. This paper presents the difference in individual well-being across these kinds of institutional settings, instrumented by the 2006 Chinese General Social Survey that sampled 28 provinces and 10000 citizens in China. We described individual well-being from objective and subjective perspectives. We measured the objective well-being by income, benefits, working conditions, and career opportunities, and the subjective well-being by individual perception of satisfaction and happiness. In general, we found that (1) people in urban China enjoy more objective well-being than people in rural China, but less subjective well-being; (2) people who work for the public sector enjoy more objective and subjective well-beings than people who work for the for-profit sector; and (3) there is no systematic difference in the levels of both types of well-being between people who work for state-owned and private enterprises.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?