GENDER DIFFERENCES IN LONELINESS AND RISK OF ELDER ABUSE IN A CHINESE COMMUNITY POPULATION

B Wang,X Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy023.1943
2018-01-01
Innovation in Aging
Abstract:Elder abuse (EA) is a violation of 2 million older men and women’s fundamental rights of being safe and free of violence, however, little is known about the gender differences in EA etiology. The study examines associations between loneliness with EA and subtypes by gender in a U.S. community-dwelling Chinese population. Data were from a representative sample of 3,157 community-dwelling older adults of the PINE project in Chicago. Dependent variables are EA measured by 56 items in aspects of psychological abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, financial exploitation, and caregiver neglect. Independent variable is loneliness measured by a validated 3-item R-UCLA scale. By gender (58.9% were female), we used logistic regression models to examine loneliness and its association with EA. After controlling for potential confounding factors, men (odds ratio [OR]: 3.20 [2.25, 4.54]) and women (OR: 2.34 [1.75, 3.14]) who had felt lonely had higher risks of any EA. For both genders, loneliness was associated with greater risks of psychological abuse (women: OR: 2.37 [1.70, 3.28]; men: OR: 3.11 [1.99, 4.84]), but not associated with physical and sexual abuse. The associations also differed by gender; only women who had felt lonely were associated with higher risks for financial exploitation OR: 1.53 [1.04, 2.25] and caregiver neglect (OR: 1.89 [1.12, 3.19]) whereas no significant associations were found in this regard among men. The results highlight the gender differences and complexity of EA, which call for more longitudinal and gender-based examinations of the etiology of EA to develop relevant practices and policies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?