A phase III trial (ZJBIO009): CMAB009 plus irinotecan versus irinotecan alone as second-line treatment after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in wild-type <i>K-ras</i> metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Yuankai Shi,Jin Li,Jianming Xu,Ying Cheng,Wei Liu,Yigui Cheng,Li Bai,Yiping Zhang,Xiaohui He,Yi Luo,Yunpeng Liu,Qiang Yao,Yuhong Li,Shukui Qin,Xiaohua HU,Yajun Guo,Yan Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.3513
IF: 45.3
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:3513 Background: More efficient second line treatment regimen for mCRC is urgently needed. CMAB009, a recombinant human/mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody, is specifically targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor. This study aimed to determine clinical efficacy and safety of CMAB009 plus irinotecan compared with irinotecan alone in wild-type K-ras mCRC patients (pts). Methods: This is a open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial. Patients had histologically confirmed wild-type K-ras mCRC, who previous failure of 5-fuorouracil plus oxaliplatin more than 1 month of the last-dose enrolled in study. Pts were randomly assigned on a 2:1 to receive CMAB009 (initial 400mg/m2 on day 1, and then 250 mg/m2 weekly) plus irinotecan (180mg/m2, every 2 weeks) (A arm) or irinotecan alone (B arm). B arm pts could switch to CMAB009 sequential treatment (C arm) on diseas progression. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were PFS, OS, DCR, and DOR (NCT01550055). Results: From May 2009 to December 2012, 512 pts were assigned from 38 sites. Efficacy evaluation could be in 501 pts, ORR were 33.2% (112/337) and 12.8% (21/164) in A arm and B arm ( p <0.0001). C arm had 115 pts, DCR was 63.5% (73/115). DOR in A arm and B arm were 210 days and 109 days ( p=0.001). In C arm, DOR was 148 days . Median PFS was significantly longer in A arm than B arm (169 days vs 95 days; p < 0.0001). In C arm, median PFS was 84 days. Median OS was 425 days in A arm and 401 days in B arm ( p=0.94). 96.2% (484/503) pts experienced at least one adverse event (AE). 55.3%(187/338) and 37.6%(62/165) patients in A arm and B arm had at least one grade ≥3 AE respectively. The most common AE included diarrhea, emesis, leucopenia, neutropenia and fatigue. Adding CMAB009 to irinotecan increased the risk of rash (66.6% vs 5.5%, p <0.001) and paronychia (9.8% vs 0,p < 0.001). Conclusions: CMAB009 plus irinotecan significantly increased ORR and prolonged PFS compared with irinotecan alone. CMAB009 plus Irinotecan were efficient and well tolerated, which could be considered as a standard second-line treatment choice in wild-type K-ras mCRC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01550055.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?