Abstract:Using a generalized cross-spectral approach, we propose a model-free omnibus statistical procedure to check whether the direction of changes in an economic variable is predictable using the history of its past changes. A class of separate inference procedures are also given to gauge possible sources of directional predictability. They can reveal information about whether the direction of future changes is predictable using the direction, level, volatility, skewness, and kurtosis of past changes. An important feature of the proposed procedures is that they check many lags simultaneously, which is particularly suitable for detecting the alternatives whose directional dependence is small at each lag but it carries over a long distributional lag. At the same time, the tests naturally discount higher order lags, which is consistent with the conventional wisdom that financial markets are more influenced by the recent past events than by the remote past events. We apply the proposed procedures to four daily U.S. stock price indices. We find overwhelming evidence that the directions of excess stock returns are predictable using past excess stock returns, and the evidence is stronger for the directional predictability of large excess stock returns. In particular, the direction and level of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with any threshold, and the volatility, skewness and kurtosis of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with nonzero thresholds (i.e., large returns). The well-known strong volatility clustering together with weak serial dependence in mean cannot completely explain all documented directional predictability for stock returns. To exploit the economic significance of the documented directional predictability for stock returns, we consider a class of autologit models for directional forecasts and find that they have significant out-of-sample directional predictive power. Some trading strategies based on these models and their combinations can earn significant out-of-sample extra risk-adjusted returns over the buy-and-hold trading strategy

Asymmetric Variance Premium, Skewness Premium, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns

Option-Implied Variance Asymmetry and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns

Does realized skewness predict the cross-section of Chinese stock returns?

Semivariance Premium and Expected Stock Returns

Expected Stock Returns and Variance Risk Premia

Asymmetries in Stock Returns: Statistical Tests and Economic Evaluation

Volatility Risk Premium, Good Volatility and Bad Volatility: Evidence from SSE 50 ETF Options

Stock Return Asymmetry: Beyond Skewness

Risk Premia: Asymmetric Tail Risks and Excess Returns

Skewness risk and the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns

Variance Risk Premium, Higher Order Risk Premium, and Expected Stock Returns

Downside Variance Premium, Firm Fundamentals, and Expected Corporate Bond Returns

The Effect of Asymmetries on Optimal Hedge Ratios

Option Implied Volatility, Skewness, and Kurtosis and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns

Stock return asymmetry in China

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable? A Generalized Cross-Spectral Approach

Stock Return Predictability and Variance Risk Premia: Statistical Inference and International Evidence

The Variance Risk Premium: Components, Term Structures, and Stock Return Predictability

Industry Variance Risk Premium, Cross‐industry Correlation, and Expected Returns

Asymmetric Multivariate HAR Models for Realized Covariance Matrix: A Study Based on Volatility Timing Strategies

Skewness Risk Premia and the Cross-Section of Currency Returns